38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 02, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court

By Gautami Chakravarty      17 December, 2020 05:41 PM      0 Comments
Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court

The Advocate General of Andhra Pradesh, Subrahmanyam Sriram, said on Monday that the State will move the Supreme Court against the October 1 order of the High Court seeking to examine whether there is a constitutional breakdown of machinery in the State. 

The AG had raised objection regarding the jurisdiction of the Court to deal with the question of constitutional breakdown and urged the bench to treat it as a preliminary issue. On October 1, 2020,the bench, also including Justice Uma Devi, had converted the hearing on a batch of habeas corpus petitions and petitions alleging police excesses as a hearing on the issue whether there is a constitutional breakdown in the State of Andhra Pradesh.

Andhra Pradesh High Court To Examine if There is Constitutional Breakdown in the State of AP:

It had directed the government counsel to make submissions on whether the court can record a finding that there is Constitutional breakdown in the light of the circumstances which are prevailing in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Responding to this, the State had filed an application for recall, while highlighting that in the absence of any pleadings in the writ petition, the court may not examine the issue regarding failure of constitutional breakdown in the state.The Court had summoned the DGP who gave assurance that instructions will be given to the Police personnel to follow all the guidelines laid down by the Supreme Court in DK Basu case and other amendments that followed the pronouncement. 

This court had asked that State counsel may come prepared on the point as too whether in the circumstances which are prevailing, court can record a finding whether there is Constitutional breakdown. 

At this juncture, Government Pleader, Senior Advocate SS Prasad pointed out that it was wrong to say that he dragged the matter for several days as on each of the hearing, the Court had recorded that proceedings were subject to hearing on the question of constitutional breakdown.

Govt. contests court's power to suo moto examine constitutional breakdown:

Govt. Pleader SS Prasad submitted that the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the suo moto question regarding constitutional breakdown of the State machinery. 

He submitted that the term 'constitutional breakdown of State machinery' used in Article 356 is not defined and as per previous judgments, the same occurs when there is political turmoil, judicial anarchy or legislative failure in the State. Prasad also submitted that the present petition does not raise any question regarding breakdown of state machinery and the Court should refrain from expanding the scope of hearings. The Bench has decided to continue hearing of the matter on Wednesday, December 16.

Petitioner's Submissions on Merits:

The Petitioner in the case at hand is an ex-MLA of the Telugu Desam party. He had submitted that the State was curbing democratic form of dissent and not providing adequate security to the agitation programs that are being conducted by political parties. Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court's verdict in Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghatan v. She submitted that the police are registering cases under the SC/ST Atrocities Act, against the persons belonging to those communities itself.

It may be noted that the State Government had challenged the locus standi of the Petitioner, a political figure, to maintain a PIL. Disputing this, the Petitioner submitted that merely because he has contested from a particular party does not make him a party not interested in the welfare of the public. Reliance was placed on Chairman, Railway Board & Ors v. At this juncture, the State counsel submitted that as per settled law, PIL can be filed by persons who are suffering from poverty, scarcity of funds, or who are precluded them from approaching the Court due to other disability.

Once the Petitioner submits that he is from a political party, it can't be a PIL. Reliance was placed on State Of Uttaranchal v.

Admissibility of Additional Affidavit filed by Petitioner:

The State had submitted that a 700-pages long additional affidavit filed by the Petitioner was prompted by what the Court observed in its order dated October 1, 2020. In case the court decides to rely on the affidavit, he submitted, the Petitioner should explain the context and relevancy of the contents and judgments relied therein with respect to reliefs sought in writ petition and the State should be allowed to file its reply thereon. Justice Rakesh Kumar was transferred from Patna High Court to Andhra Pradesh High Court last year. Shortly before his transfer to AP High Court, Justice Rakesh Kumar had created a furore in the Patna High Court by passing a direction for CBI investigation into alleged corruption in the subordinate judiciary.

In that order, Justice Rakesh Kumar had made startling observations such as corruption in this High Court is an open secret and that judges were more interested in enjoying privileges than administering justice. Soon after that order, a 11-judge bench assembled to suspend it after observing that Justice Kumar's observations as judicial and administrative overreach.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court Andhra Pradesh High Court Refuses to Recall Order for Examining 'Constitutional Breakdown' of State Machinery; Govt to Move Supreme Court

order,a 11-judge bench assembled to suspend it after observing that Justice Kumar's observations as judicial and administrative overreach. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Justice Rakesh Kumar, AG Subrahmanyam Sriram

Andhra Pradesh High Court permits Anandaiahs Ayurvedic concoction for COVID patients Andhra Pradesh High Court permits Anandaiahs Ayurvedic concoction for COVID patients

The Court directed Anandaiah and the district administration to discuss ways to manage COVID and to ensure a smooth flow of the medicines. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement, Andhra Pradesh High Court order

Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centres response on insufficient allocation of resources for treatment of Mucormycosis Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centres response on insufficient allocation of resources for treatment of Mucormycosis

to be fully equipped with the required man-power to handle the situation. In view of this, the Court directed the State to file a memo with regard to steps taken by it with regard to recruitment of paramedical staff. Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh High Court order, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement

Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centre and State Governments response on PIL seeking Optical Fibre Network, IT Infrastructure for District Courts Andhra Pradesh High Court seeks Centre and State Governments response on PIL seeking Optical Fibre Network, IT Infrastructure for District Courts

The Himachal Pradesh High Court had recently observed that, the need of the hour is to provide adequate bandwidth, network-attached storage and routers etc. to facilitate the conducting of educational courses, conferences, court proceedings etc. on virtual platform. Andhra Pradesh High Court order, Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement, Fibre Network in India, IT Infrastructure components

TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-first-consider-maintainability-of-review-against-2022-judgment-on-eds-powers-under-pmla
Trending Judiciary
SC to first consider maintainability of review against 2022 judgment on ED's powers under PMLA

SC to first decide if review pleas on ED powers under PMLA are maintainable; hearing on Karti Chidambaram’s plea set for August 6.

01 August, 2025 10:58 AM
sc-recalls-may-2-judgment-scrapping-jsw-steels-resolution-plan-for-bhushan-power-and-steel-ltd
Trending Business
SC recalls May 2 judgment scrapping JSW Steel's resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd

SC recalls its May 2 verdict cancelling JSW Steel’s ₹19,300 Cr resolution plan for Bhushan Power; matter to be heard afresh on August 7.

01 August, 2025 11:13 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-questions-justice-varma-over-failure-to-challenge-validity-of-in-house-inquiry-panel
Trending Judiciary
SC questions Justice Varma over failure to challenge validity of in-house inquiry panel

SC questions Justice Varma for not challenging in-house probe panel earlier despite cash haul case; asks why he joined inquiry if he found it flawed.

28 July, 2025 02:27 PM
timelines-for-governor-prez-to-clear-bills-kerala-asks-sc-to-return-presidential-reference-unanswered
Trending Executive
Timelines for Governor, Prez to clear Bills: Kerala asks SC to return presidential reference "unanswered"

Kerala urges SC to return Presidential reference on bill clearance timelines as “unmaintainable”, citing suppression of facts and settled SC rulings under Article 200.

28 July, 2025 02:38 PM
sc-refuses-to-stay-publication-of-draft-voters-list-in-bihar-on-aug-1
Trending Judiciary
SC refuses to stay publication of draft voters list in Bihar on Aug 1

SC declines stay on Bihar draft voter list; asks EC to consider Aadhaar, Voter ID for inclusion ahead of Assembly polls on August 1.

28 July, 2025 04:10 PM
why-so-many-students-dying-by-suicides-sc-asks-iit-kharagpur
Trending Judiciary
Why so many students dying by suicides, SC asks IIT Kharagpur

SC asks IIT Kharagpur why students are dying by suicide; raises concern amid rising campus deaths despite new mental health guidelines.

29 July, 2025 11:51 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email