38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, July 15, 2024

Anil Ambani's Reliance Infrastructure playing hide and seek, not here with clean hands; Delhi High Court

By LawStreet News Network      13 January, 2022 08:10 PM      0 Comments
Anil Ambani Reliance Infrastructure Delhi High Court

"The High Court was hearing an execution case brought by a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure seeking to execute a Rs 7,200 crore arbitration judgement in its favour."

On the 11th of January, the Delhi High Court stated that Anil Ambani's Reliance Infrastructure and its subsidiary Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL) were playing hide-and-seek with the Court and had not appeared with clean hands. [Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited v Delhi Metro Rail Corporation].

The remarks were made during the ongoing hearing of an execution case brought by DAMEPL before the bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait for seeking enforcement of the Rs 7,200 crore arbitration award that it won against the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). In September of last year, the Supreme Court reinstated the award.

The Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi, counsel for DMRC, informed the Court on Tuesday that the DAMEPL was in discussions with the DMRC to take over its obligations and liabilities of Rs 6,200 crore. This, according to Tripathi, was in contradiction to the company's statement in court, where it had flatly refused a similar offer from the Centre government. Tripathi highlighted the communications between DAMEPL and DMRC dated December 30, 31, and January 6 as proof that the company had been in contact with DMRC, and that it was willing to work with them provided they would take over the entire debt of DMRC's existing liabilities of Rs 6,200 crore.

DAMEPL's counsel, Advocate Prateek Seksaria, contended that the government was deceiving the Court on the matter because it was DMRC that had started the communication outside of court by scheduling a meeting with the lenders despite the company's rejection of the proposal.

"We informed them that we were astonished to see that DMRC officials had invited our lenders without giving us any advance notice." DMRC would have the locus to meet our bankers only if they agreed to take over the liabilities. You can't meet them behind our backs, He remarked. This blatant attempt is futile and this has been rejected in the court." Seksaria argued, "I have stated nothing different."


The Bench, on the other hand, stated that whenever DAMEPL appears in front of the Court, it takes a different stance while continuing to talk to DMRC outside of court. "Don't engage in conversation with them and fight in court at the same time." If you do, the petition will be dismissed," Justice Kait warned. 

The Court stated in its order, that "The decree-holder is not appearing before the Court with clean hands because the petitioner's counsel is making submissions before this Court and interacting with the debtor to settle the issue in the way preferred by debtors."

The matter is now scheduled for a hearing on March 29.

DMRC recently notified the Delhi High Court that it has just over Rs. 6,200 crores in its bank accounts, which is insufficient to pay the Rs. 7,200 crore payment ordered by an arbitral tribunal to be paid to DAMEPL. 

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Need to develop law, legal education in vernacular languages: CJI [Read Speech]

CJI D.Y. Chandrachud emphasizes the need for developing law and legal education in vernacular languages to make legal systems accessible to all citizens.

15 July, 2024 09:30 AM
Trending Judiciary
CIC has powers to set up benches: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court affirms CIC's authority to set up benches, emphasizing its autonomy for efficient case management under the RTI Act, overturning the 2010 Delhi HC order.

15 July, 2024 09:42 AM


Trending Crime, Police And Law
Journalist Soumya Vishwanathan murder case: SC issues notice to 4 convicts on appeal by Delhi police

SC issues notice to 4 convicts in Soumya Vishwanathan murder case on Delhi police's appeal against their bail. Convicts had served over 14 years.

09 July, 2024 09:49 AM
Trending Judiciary
Why Indian High Courts still have old names despite change in city name ? [Watch Video]

Know the reasons why Indian High Courts, like Bombay HC, Madras HC, and Calcutta HC, Allahabad HC still retain their old names despite the cities’ name changes. LawStreet Journal delves into the historical and legal context. Watch report !

09 July, 2024 09:56 AM
Trending International
What is Keir Starmer’s stance on Kashmir issue ? [Watch Video]

Under Keir Starmer, the UK's Labour Party shifts its stance on Article 370, focusing on strategic ties with India, moving from past criticisms to cooperation.

09 July, 2024 10:04 AM
Trending Judiciary
ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC order of bail to CM Hemant Soren

ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC's bail order for CM Hemant Soren in a money laundering case linked to an alleged land scam.

09 July, 2024 12:14 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email