38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

1984 Anti Sikh Riots: SIT's Plea For Early Hearing Challenging Anticipatory Bail Granted To Sajjan Kumar Rejected By SC

By LawStreet News Network      04 March, 2020 09:03 PM      0 Comments
1984 Anti Sikh Riots: SIT's Plea For Early Hearing Challenging Anticipatory Bail Granted To Sajjan Kumar Rejected By SC

The Apex Court on 2nd March, 2020 rejected a plea filed by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) that sought an early hearing of a petition challenging the anticipatory bail granted to former Congress leader Sajjan Kumar in 2018. The matter is concerning the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. 

Application for early hearing is dismissed, said a bench comprising Chief Justice S A Bobde and Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kand.

The bench further asked SIT, Is he inside the jail or not, wherein the bench referred to the case in which Kumar has been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

An appeal was filed against the Delhi High Court decision of 22nd February, 2018 that upheld a trial court order which reportedly granted an anticipatory bail to Kumar in two anti- Sikh riots cases. 

The anticipatory bail by the trial court order was granted on 21st December, 2016. The Delhi High Court convicted and sentenced him to life imprisonment on 17th December, 2018 in another 1984 anti-Sikh riots case.

The case relates to the killing of five Sikhs in Delhi Cantonments Raj Nagar Part-I area of southwest Delhi on November 1-2 in 1984, and burning down of a gurdwara in Raj Nagar Part-II.

Furthermore, Kumar has challenged the Delhi High Court's verdict of 2019 in the Supreme Court. He is being represented by Senior Advocate Vikas Singh

Author - Dyuti Pandya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

44-retired-judges-defend-cji-warn-judicial-independence-at-risk-amid-rohingya-case-row
Trending Legal Insiders
44 Retired Judges Defend CJI, Warn ‘Judicial Independence at Risk’ Amid Rohingya Case Row [Read Letter]

44 retired judges back the CJI in the Rohingya case row, warning that attacks on judicial scrutiny threaten independence and calling for a court-monitored SIT probe.

10 December, 2025 12:15 AM
pakistan-secures-12-billion-imf-disbursement-amid-economic-recovery-and-climate-reform-push
Trending International
Pakistan Secures $1.2 Billion IMF Disbursement Amid Economic Recovery and Climate Reform Push

IMF approves $1.2 billion for Pakistan, boosting economic recovery, fiscal reforms and climate resilience under the EFF and RSF programmes.

10 December, 2025 01:17 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-30-reservation-for-women-in-all-state-bar-councils-bci-rules-deemed-amended
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders 30% Reservation for Women in All State Bar Councils; BCI Rules ‘Deemed Amended’ [Read Order]

Supreme Court orders BCI to ensure 30% reservation for women in all State Bar Councils, deeming rules amended to achieve gender parity in legal governance.

05 December, 2025 04:47 PM
sc-holds-working-from-home-not-determinative-factor-in-child-custody-dismisses-mothers-appeal
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Working From Home Not Determinative Factor In Child Custody, Dismisses Mother’s Appeal [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that working from home cannot determine child custody, dismissing the mother’s appeal while upholding the father’s custody and visitation rights.

05 December, 2025 05:22 PM
delhi-hc-rejects-interim-injunction-to-novo-nordisk-in-semaglutide-patent-case-against-dr-reddys
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Rejects Interim Injunction To Novo Nordisk in Semaglutide Patent Case Against Dr. Reddy’s [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court denies Novo Nordisk’s interim injunction in the Semaglutide patent suit, allowing Dr. Reddy’s to manufacture and export to non-patented markets.

05 December, 2025 05:44 PM
sc-discharges-accused-in-property-dispute-case-emphasizes-need-for-strong-suspicion
Trending Judiciary
SC Discharges Accused in Property Dispute Case, Emphasizes Need for ‘Strong Suspicion’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court discharges accused in Kolkata property dispute, holding that criminal trials require strong suspicion based on legally tenable evidence.

05 December, 2025 06:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email