38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Stays Woman's Plea Who Claims To Be Famous Singer Anuradha Paudwal's Daughter

By LawStreet News Network      30 January, 2020 06:01 PM      0 Comments
SC Stays Woman's Plea Who Claims To Be Famous Singer Anuradha Paudwal's Daughter

On the request of famous playback singer Anuradha Paudwal, the Supreme Court today (January 30, 2020) has stayed the proceedings initiated by a woman of  Thiruvananthapuram who claims to be the singers biological daughter.

Paudwal also filed a plea asking for the transfer of the case from Thiruvananthapuram court to a Mumbai court, on which the bench headed by Chief Justice of India, SA Bobde has already issued a notice to the woman. 

The woman is a 46 years old lady named Karmala Modex, a resident of Thiruvananthapuram. She claims that the singer handed over her to her foster parents -  Ponnachan and Agnes - in 1974 at the time of her birth as she did not want children because of her career.

Modex's lawyer said, Ponnachan, who passed away a few years ago had revealed in his death bed to Modex that she is the biological daughter of Arun-Anuradha couple." She also claimed that she tried to contact the singer before filing the case but never received any response.

The Thiruvananthapuram Family court has asked the singer and her two children to appear in front of the court on Monday (February 3, 2020).

Modex is claiming Rs. 50 crores as compensation for denying her a childhood and the life that she should have gotten. She said that she is also entitled to a one-fourth share of the property and assets of the singer.

Author Aditi Dubey



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email