38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, June 17, 2024
Judiciary

Apex Court Issues Notice on plea against the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for Increasing Mandatory Limit for CS Appointment

By Shreedhara Purohit      10 August, 2020 07:39 PM      0 Comments
Apex Court Issues Notice on plea against the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for Increasing Mandatory Limit for CS Appointment

The Supreme Court on August 5, 2020 sought response from the Centre on a plea against a notification which exempts public and private companies, having paid up capital of less than Rs 10 crore, from appointing a full time company secretary. The Apex Court issued a noticein a plea seeking declaration of the notification  as being ultra-vires and repugnant to the article 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India by the Centre on  January 1st 2020 and its subsequent enforcement w.e.f. 01.04.2020.

The plea was taken by a bench comprising of Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices AS Bopanna & V. Ramasubramaniun which seek that in order to look into the lapses which led to the closure of more than six lakh companies across the country, formulation of a High Powered Committee has been requested.

It further sought to fix the corporate accountability and responsibility to the perpetrators who were responsible for the formation and operations of the fictitious and shell companies through which thousands of crores were manipulated to the detriment of financial infrastructure of the country.

In the Ministry of Corporate Affairs impugned notification, the mandatory limit for CS appointment was enhanced from 5 Crore to 10 crores.

The plea has sought to declare as ultra-virus of the Constitution a notification issued by the Centre on January 3.It read, “In this respect it is pertinently submitted that the said notification dated 03.01.2020 is constitutionally impermissible in as much as there is no rational basis for the categorization and classification for the purpose of requirement of regulatory professionals i.e. Company Secretaries, as the necessity of compliance of Companies Act is sacrosanct and absolute and any compromise by way of classification on a ground of paid-up capital cannot be treated as a reasonable classification and exempting the companies from the regulatory compliances on the basis of irrational and unreasonable classification under the garb of paid up capital is discriminatory in as much as it infringes Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

It mentioned that the notificationn made it mandatory that every private company which has a paid-up share capital of Rs 10 crore or more shall have a whole-time company secretary. As a result, all the public and private company having the paid-up capital of less than Rs 10 crore were totally exempted from the appointment of whole-time company secretary.

The contention was raised that lack of a robust mechanism leads to a large number of companies being involved in financial shenanigans and misfeasance of the public money by the corporate fraudster which causes huge loss to the interests of nation.Hence, there comes the request to seek for directions to issue comprehensive guidelines in respect of a robust mechanism for enforcement of Corporate Governance.

It was mentioned in the plea that there was no rational basis for such categorization and classification as the necessity of compliance of Companies Act is inviolable and absolute and any compromise by way of categorization on a ground of paid up capital cannot be treated as a reasonable classification and exempting the companies from the regulatory compliances on the basis of irrational and unreasonable classification under the garb of paid up capital is discriminatory in as much as it infringes Article 14 of the Constitution of India.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

women-including-housewife-approach-ncw-against-controversial-ips-officer-gyaneshwar-singh
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Women, including housewife, approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh

Two women approach NCW against controversial IPS officer Gyaneshwar Singh, citing harassment for tweets based on news reports about his involvement in high-profile cases.

17 June, 2024 03:10 PM
courts-this-week-law-street-journal-s-weekly-round-up-of-sc-anf-hcs-june-10-june-15
Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [June 10 - June 15]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

17 June, 2024 03:29 PM

TOP STORIES

plea-filed-in-sc-for-fresh-neet
Trending Judiciary
Plea filed in SC for fresh NEET

Plea filed in Supreme Court seeks fresh NEET-UG 2024 exams due to alleged paper leaks and malpractices. Petitioners demand a Special Investigation Team and preventive measures.

11 June, 2024 10:49 AM
plant-30-trees-delhi-hc-orders-senior-citizen-accused-of-outraging-womans-modesty
Trending Judiciary
'Plant 30 trees', Delhi HC orders senior citizen accused of outraging woman's modesty

Plant 30 trees Delhi High Court orders senior citizen accused of outraging womans modesty

11 June, 2024 11:17 AM
no-liability-under-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques-of-merged-banks-presented-after-validity-period
Trending Judiciary
No liability under NI Act for dishonoured cheques of merged banks presented after validity period [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that dishonoured cheques from merged banks presented after the validity period won't attract liability under Section 138 of the NI Act.

11 June, 2024 11:29 AM
modi-30-cabinet-full-list-of-ministers-and-their-respective-portfolios
Trending Executive
Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Full list of ministers and their respective portfolios

Modi 3.0 Cabinet: Amit Shah, S. Jaishankar, Nirmala Sitharaman, and Rajnath Singh retain key roles; allies TDP, JD(U), LJP, JD(S) secure major ministries.

11 June, 2024 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email