38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Apex Court Rules on the Guidelines Issued by The UGC, states that universities cannot promote the final or terminal semester students without examination [READ JUDGMENT]

By Lakshya Tewari      01 September, 2020 05:24 PM      0 Comments
Apex Court Rules on the Guidelines Issued by The UGC, states that universities cannot promote the final or terminal semester students without examination [READ JUDGMENT]

In a verdict by the apex court by a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bushan and comprising R Subhash Reddy and M R Shah on Friday (August 28, 2020), it was held that the universities cannot promote the final or terminal semester students without examination. The case was filed by various students and several PILs were also filed in the same regard, includingthe YuvaSena on behalf of Maharashtra States decision to cancel exams. 

The bench said that the State authorities and the State Disaster Management Authority are more competent to access the situation of the state in regard to the current pandemic. The authorities can write a letter to the UGC (universities grants commission) with regards to rescheduling the examination after taking view of the situation for physically holding the examinations in their respective states. 

The bench also considered the submission that the UGC prohibits state or the state disaster management authorities from exercising its powers under the Disaster Management Act, 200, to not hold examinations, looking into the situation in a particular state. It was held that the state government can reschedule the examination and extend the date further to September 30th, 2020.

The apex court also said that State Government or State Disaster Management Authority in the exercise of power under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 has no jurisdiction to make a decision that student of final year or terminal year should be promoted without conducting examination on the basis of previous assessment and internal assessment. This issue arose when the State Disaster Management Authority of Maharashtra had resolved to pass the final year students to pass them without conducting the terminal or final semester paper. 

The court also said that the UGC guidelines overrides the decision of the State Disaster Management Authority or the State Government with regards to promoting final or terminal semester students, since this does not fall within the ambit of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and shall have no protection of section 72 of the act. 

There were certain other orders also made in regard to this case by the Supreme Court of India. The SC said that UGCs decision to conduct examination by 30th September is not beyond its domain as they relate to the coordination and determination of standards in institutions of higher education. The guidelines dated 06-07-2020 were not contrary to the guidelines of 29-03-2020 and as a matter of fact they are in continuance to it. There was no discrimination done between final/terminal semester students and those of intermediate first-year students as it was a rational differentiation. 

The Supreme court also stated that there was no violation of Article 21 since the guidelines shows the appropriate concern for the students and the other stakeholders whose health is involved and also the said orders were not in violation of Article 14 of the constitution as they aim to maintain the uniformity in the academic calendar across states and union territories.

 

[READ JUDGMENT]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email