38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 09, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Application For Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Rejected Solely On The Ground That Petition U/S 482 CrPC Was Dismissed Earlier: SC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      16 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Application For Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Rejected Solely On The Ground That Petition U/S 482 CrPC Was Dismissed Earlier: SC [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on July 9, 2019, in the case of Kamlesh & Anr. v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr., has observed that an application for anticipatory bail cannot be rejected only on the ground that the petition filed by the accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for quashing of FIR, has already been rejected.

The observation was made by a Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha while it was hearing an appeal arising out of an SLP filed against the order of the Rajasthan High Court in which the court had dismissed the anticipatory bail application moved by the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the complainant solely on the ground that their plea under Section 482 of CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR stands dismissed.

Hearing the appeal, the Bench said: We are of the view that the order of the High Court cannot be sustained. High Court ought to have considered the application on merits. The fact that petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for quashing was not conclusive and could not be the reason for rejecting the application.

The Bench noted that in the SLP filed by the husband of the complainant, the apex court had passed an order not to arrest the in-laws subject to their cooperation with the investigation.

Accordingly, the Bench disposed of the appeal by confirming the protection from arrest granted to the appellants subject to the condition that they would cooperate with the investigation and appear as and when they are called by a written notice.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email