38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 30, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Application For Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Rejected Solely On The Ground That Petition U/S 482 CrPC Was Dismissed Earlier: SC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      16 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Application For Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Rejected Solely On The Ground That Petition U/S 482 CrPC Was Dismissed Earlier: SC [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on July 9, 2019, in the case of Kamlesh & Anr. v. The State of Rajasthan & Anr., has observed that an application for anticipatory bail cannot be rejected only on the ground that the petition filed by the accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for quashing of FIR, has already been rejected.

The observation was made by a Bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Navin Sinha while it was hearing an appeal arising out of an SLP filed against the order of the Rajasthan High Court in which the court had dismissed the anticipatory bail application moved by the mother-in-law and father-in-law of the complainant solely on the ground that their plea under Section 482 of CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR stands dismissed.

Hearing the appeal, the Bench said: We are of the view that the order of the High Court cannot be sustained. High Court ought to have considered the application on merits. The fact that petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for quashing was not conclusive and could not be the reason for rejecting the application.

The Bench noted that in the SLP filed by the husband of the complainant, the apex court had passed an order not to arrest the in-laws subject to their cooperation with the investigation.

Accordingly, the Bench disposed of the appeal by confirming the protection from arrest granted to the appellants subject to the condition that they would cooperate with the investigation and appear as and when they are called by a written notice.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email