38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, March 29, 2024
Judiciary

'Right to Apply for Bail is an Individual Right Implicit in Articles 14, 19 & 21' of the Constitution' : Supreme Court

By Dolly Chhabda      02 October, 2021 03:13 PM      0 Comments
'Right to Apply for Bail is an Individual Right Implicit in Articles 14, 19 & 21' of the Constitution' : Supreme Court

Recently, the Supreme Court disapproved the blanket orders passed by Rajasthan High Court to not list application relating to bail appeals, applications for suspension of sentence and revisions as urgent matters during the lockdown.

"The right to apply for bail is implicit in Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution and cannot be taken away by judicial order, " the bench of Justices Nageswara Rao and Aniruddha Bose stated. 

The Court stated: 

“Such right has been taken away by judicial order, without compliance of procedure established by law, which in our constitutional jurisprudence, is akin to ‘the due process’ dictum. Right to apply for bail is an individual right implicit in Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution." 

Citing the Covid-19 pandemic, the bench directed the registry to neither list the matters relating to anticipatory bails in case of offences carrying maximum three years sentence and nor regular bail matters.

These orders were challenged by the Rajasthan High Court before the Apex Court, wherein the Apex court replied that these orders will also affect temporary eclipsing of statutory provisions. 

The Supreme Court said:

"Such an order also has the effect of temporarily eclipsing statutory provisions" 

The Bench also stated: 

"Such right has been taken away by judicial order, without compliance of procedure established by law, which in our constitutional jurisprudence, is a is akin to "the due process" dictum." 

Justice Bose stated in the judgement: 

"Right to apply for bail is an individual right implicit in Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution."

The Bench further stated that the orders impacted the operation of legislative provisions on the right to apply for bail and encroached upon the Chief Justice’s administrative powers on allocation of business to judges of the Court.

The Court also said: 

“Such sweeping orders in our adversarial adjudicatory system would be contrary to law as many persons would be impacted by such orders without having any knowledge of the proceeding." 

The Bench opinied that a blanket ban on listing of applications would block access to seekers of liberty and in substance suspend their fundamental rights and would also have the impact of temporarily eclipsing statutory provisions.

Therefore, it was concluded that considering comprehensive guidelines detailed under the case of Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar, there was no need for the single-judge to issue such blanket directives.

The Judgement said: “The directions issued had the potential for breaching the constitutional and legal rights of individuals who could be or are arraigned in criminal action and also put fetters on power of investigating agencies.”

These impugned orders were issued in applications for anticipatory bails during the Covid-19 pandemic was raging across this country and so, the bail pleas were ultimately rejected by the High Court later.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arvind-kejriwals-plea-for-interim-release-rejected-by-delhi-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Arvind Kejriwal's plea for interim release rejected by Delhi High Court [Read Order]

Delhi High Court rejects Arvind Kejriwal's plea for interim release in money laundering case related to liquor policy scam, pending ED's response.

28 March, 2024 10:50 AM
youtuber-strings-plea-against-youtube-accounts-suspension-andhra-pradesh-hc-issues-notice-to-centre-google
Trending Top Stories
BREAKING: Youtuber String’s plea against Youtube accounts suspension: Andhra Pradesh HC issues notice to Centre, Google

Andhra Pradesh High Court issues notice to the Centre and Google LLC on Youtube journalist String’s plea against suspension of its accounts by Google (which owns Youtube).

28 March, 2024 11:26 AM

TOP STORIES

delhi-liquor-scam-court-remands-arvind-kejriwal-to-ed-custody-till-march-28-read-remand-application
Trending Judiciary
Delhi liquor scam: Court remands Arvind Kejriwal to ED custody till March 28 [Read Order]

Delhi liquor scam: Arvind Kejriwal remanded to ED custody till March 28. Court grants agency permission for interrogation in liquor policy case.

23 March, 2024 11:53 AM
sc-dismisses-centres-plea-for-review-of-judgment-directing-ed-to-furnish-written-grounds-of-arrest-to-pmla-accused
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Centre’s plea for review of judgment directing ED to furnish written grounds of arrest to PMLA accused [Read Order]

Supreme Court dismisses Centre's plea, upholds judgment mandating Enforcement Directorate to provide written grounds of arrest in PMLA cases.

23 March, 2024 03:14 PM
kerala-hc-to-hear-lesbian-couples-plea-against-forced-conversion-therapy-on-april-9
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC to hear lesbian couple’s plea against forced conversion therapy on April 9

Kerala HC will hear a lesbian couple’s plea highlighting that one of them was subjected to forced conversion therapy.

23 March, 2024 03:30 PM
how-can-people-be-compelled-to-vote-madras-hc-asks
Trending Judiciary
“How can people be compelled to vote? Madras HC asks

“How can people be compelled to vote?”, the Madras HC queried in a plea asking employers in Tamil Nadu to demand proof from employees of having voted on polling day.

23 March, 2024 05:04 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email