38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Army Member Moves Delhi HC Against 'Draconian' Policy Forcing All Armed Forces Personnel to Remove Their Social Media Profiles Like Twitter, Instagram

By Manthan Pandit      18 July, 2020 05:04 PM      0 Comments
Army Member Moves Delhi HC Against 'Draconian' Policy Forcing All Armed Forces Personnel to Remove Their Social Media Profiles Like Twitter, Instagram

A petition against an order by the Director-General of Military Intelligence was filed before the Delhi High Court, asking all Indian Army personnel to uninstall Facebook, Instagram, and 87 other social media applications.

The petition was filed by a serving lieutenant colonel who, in the absence of access to social media, finds it difficult to communicate with his family residing outside India.

He submitted that from time to time he is using his Facebook account responsibly in compliance with the guidelines provided by the Indian Army, and he has never posted any confidential or sensitive details about his position and duties as an Indian Army officer over Facebook or any other social networking site.

"Soldiers rely on social networking platforms like Facebook to address various issues arising in their families while posted in remote locations and often use the virtual connection to compensate for the physical distance existing between themselves and their families," the plea states.

It is contended that the ban violates various fundamental rights of the Petitioner under the Constitution, including the right to freedom of speech and expression and right to privacy, whereas the power to modify fundamental rights of members of armed forces rests with the Parliament alone.

"Article 33 permits the Parliament, by law, to modify fundamental rights by members of armed forces i.e, Soldiers. The Respondent No.1 is not the Parliament. Ban on use of social networking platforms and order to delete accounts vide the Policy is an attempt by the Respondent No.1 to usurp and assume powers which are vested exclusively with the Parliament in terms of Article 33," the Petitioner argues. Reliance is placed on Union of India v. G.S. Bajwa, (2003) 9 SCC 630.

It is also submitted that the restrictions contained in the Policy, particularly relating to ban on the use of social networking platforms and deletion of accounts therein are not contemplated under Section 21 (Power to modify certain fundamental rights in their application to persons subject to this Act) of the Army Act, 1950 and or the Rules framed by the Central Government in terms of the said provision.

The Petitioner pointed out that while on the one hand soldiers are told to avoid using all major social media sites and remove their user accounts, on the other hand, the Respondents devise strategies to sensitize soldiers and educate them on social networking platforms to conduct them appropriately and safely.

"Such contradictions in the Policy are a testament to the nonapplication of mind while formulating the same," the Petitioner remarks.

Further, it is contended that the policy is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution in as much as there are several members of the civil administration and political class who possess information of a much higher level of sensitivity than a regular soldier. However, no restrictions on the use of social media apply to the said persons.

Therefore, the Petitioner has prayed to the High Court to order the Respondent to revoke its "draconian" policy of 6th June 2020, to the degree that it forbids the military personnel from using social media or allows them to delete their accounts.

He has also requested a guarantee that, under the constitution or any other statute, the Director-General of Military Intelligence is not allowed to alter, change or abrogate the constitutional rights of the members of the armed forces. 

The petition was filed via Advocates Shivank Pratap Singh and Sanandika Pratap Singh and will be classified tomorrow, 14th July 2020, for hearing.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

kerala-high-court-grants-interim-bail-to-news-channel-editors-in-pocso-case
Trending Judiciary
Kerala High Court grants interim bail to News Channel Editors in POCSO Case [Read Order]

Kerala High Court grants interim anticipatory bail to two journalists in a POCSO case, noting no grievance from the victim or their parents. Hearing on Feb 3, 2025.

22 January, 2025 12:08 PM
orissa-high-court-clarifies-personal-appearance-rules-in-sc-st-act-cases
Trending Judiciary
Orissa High Court clarifies personal appearance rules in SC/ST Act cases [Read Judgment]

Orissa High Court clarifies that personal appearance can be exempted under Section 205 CrPC in SC/ST Act cases to prevent unnecessary harassment.

22 January, 2025 01:17 PM

TOP STORIES

congress-moves-sc-to-defend-places-of-worship-act-calls-it-key-to-secularism
Trending Executive
Congress Moves SC to Defend Places of Worship Act, Calls It Key to Secularism

Congress defends the Places of Worship Act in SC, calling it vital for safeguarding secularism, communal harmony, and India’s constitutional principles.

17 January, 2025 07:53 PM
sc-stays-hcs-order-to-delhi-govt-to-sign-mou-ayushman-bharat-scheme
Trending Judiciary
SC stays HC's order to Delhi govt to sign MoU Ayushman Bharat scheme

SC stays HC’s order directing Delhi govt to sign MoU for Ayushman Bharat scheme implementation, citing concerns over redefined powers of NCT govt.

18 January, 2025 05:11 PM
abetment-to-suicide-cant-be-used-to-assuage-familys-feelings-sc
Trending Judiciary
Abetment to suicide can't be used to assuage family's feelings: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Abetment to suicide laws must not be misused to console grieving families; courts, agencies urged to ensure stricter scrutiny under Section 306 IPC.

18 January, 2025 05:39 PM
sc-stays-defamation-proceedings-against-rahul-gandhi
Trending Judiciary
SC stays defamation proceedings against Rahul Gandhi

SC stays defamation case against Rahul Gandhi over remarks on Amit Shah, providing relief as trial court proceedings remain suspended until further orders.

20 January, 2025 12:30 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email