38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Arnab Goswami Moves Supreme Court Challenging Bombay High Court Order Dismissing his Plea for Interim Bail

By Pavitra Shetty      11 November, 2020 05:43 PM      0 Comments
Arnab Goswami Moves Supreme Court Challenging Bombay High Court Order Dismissing his Plea for Interim Bail

Republic TV editor Arnab Goswami moved the Supreme Court after the Bombay High Court dismissed his petition for interim bail in the 2018 abetment to suicide case.

Arnab Goswami along with two others Feroze Shaikh and Nitish Sarda by Alibag Police and remanded to judicial custody for 14 days on November 4, 2020 in connection with the death of interior designer Anvay Naik and his mother Kumud Naik in 2018.

Arnab Goswami had filed an interim bail plea before the Bombay high court on Saturday (November 7, 2020).

The court had reserved its order on Arnab Goswamis plea and given him an option to file the application in sessions court and he then filed a bail plea before a sessions court.

Arnab Goswami was kept at a local school designated as a Covid-19 center for the Alibag prison till November 8, after which he was shifted to the Taloja jail in Navi Mumbai.

Arnab Goswami alleged that he was being subjected to torture and was not being allowed to talk to his lawyer.

The decision to move him to the jail before he completed his quarantine period at the school was taken after he was allegedly found using someones mobile phone to access his social media accounts in the quarantine center. 

His mobile phone was confiscated by the police at the time of his arrest.

A bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice Indira Banerjee will hear the petition at 10.30 am on Wednesday.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-slams-maharashtra-police-over-four-year-delay-in-framing-charges-seeks-explanation-from-sp-and-trial-court
Trending Judiciary
SC Slams Maharashtra Police Over Four-Year Delay In Framing Charges; Seeks Explanation From SP And Trial Court [Read Order]

The Supreme Court criticises Maharashtra Police for a four-year delay in framing charges and seeks explanations from the SP and Trial Court over prolonged incarceration.

14 November, 2025 10:19 AM
long-custody-no-ground-for-bail-under-section-37-ndps-sc
Trending Judiciary
Long Custody No Ground for Bail Under Section 37 NDPS: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside Bombay HC bail orders, ruling that prolonged custody cannot dilute the strict Section 37 NDPS embargo in a 50 kg cocaine case.

14 November, 2025 12:54 PM

TOP STORIES

state-govt-cannot-appeal-in-cbi-prosecuted-cases-supreme-court-reaffirms-lalu-prasad-yadav-judgment
Trending Judiciary
State Govt Cannot Appeal In CBI-Prosecuted Cases: Supreme Court Reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav Judgment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court reaffirms Lalu Prasad Yadav ruling, holding that State Governments cannot appeal acquittals in CBI-investigated cases.

10 November, 2025 12:28 PM
managing-director-falls-within-definition-of-employer-under-minimum-wages-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Managing Director Falls Within Definition Of ‘Employer’ Under Minimum Wages Act: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that a Managing Director qualifies as an “employer” under the Minimum Wages Act, upholding liability for unpaid wages.

10 November, 2025 12:48 PM
accused-can-rebut-presumption-of-debt-us-139-ni-act-by-showing-probable-circumstances-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Accused Can Rebut Presumption Of Debt U/S 139 NI Act By Showing Probable Circumstances: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that an accused can rebut the presumption under Section 139 NI Act by proving absence of debt through probable circumstances.

10 November, 2025 01:16 PM
tenant-cannot-challenge-landlords-title-after-decades-of-paying-rent-sc
Trending Judiciary
Tenant Cannot Challenge Landlord’s Title After Decades Of Paying Rent: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a tenant cannot dispute the landlord’s ownership after paying rent for decades, reinforcing the principle of estoppel in tenancy.

10 November, 2025 01:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email