38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Attorney General Reveals Monsoon Session Plans for Data Protection Bill, Leaving WhatsApp Users Breathless!

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      12 April, 2023 02:13 AM      0 Comments
Attorney General Reveals Monsoon Session Plans for Data Protection Bill, Leaving WhatsApp Users Breathless!

NEW DELHI: Attorney General R Venkataramani on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill is ready and will be introduced in Parliament in the upcoming Monsoon Session.

This would also address concerns raised about personal data protection in connection with WhatsApp privacy policy, he added.

On February 1, the Supreme Court had directed WhatsApp to give wide publicity in the media that users aren't bound to accept its 2021 privacy policy and also WhatsApp's functionality would not be affected till the new Data Protection Bill comes into effect.

On Tuesday, Venkatramani submitted before a five-judge Constitution bench led by Justice K M Joseph that the Bill is ready. It would be introduced in Parliament. The AG stressed, "In the monsoon session, it (Bill) will be introduced..."

Justice Joseph asked the AG, "Monsoon Session means?" The AG replied that it will be in July.

The bench -- also comprising Justices Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and C T Ravikumar --  then deferred the hearing.

At this juncture, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing WhatsApp, said the session is at the end of July. It was suggested to the bench that having a hearing in the matter in August will be more practical.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan, representing one of the petitioners, said the matter should be listed earlier and the Bill was supposed to be introduced in the last winter session but it did not happen.

The AG replied that the consultation process is a continuous process, "it went through a very qualified consultation process and do not say that we are taking time, and you want a good law to come..."

Divan replied, "We, of course, want a good law to come...", and asked the court to not link court hearing to the legislative process and stressed that the legislative process is complex, and the Bill may be referred to some committee and it may go here or it may go there.

After hearing the submissions, the bench noted AG's submissions that the Bill, which would address all the concerns, is going to be tabled during the Monsoon Session, which will commence in July. The bench said considering the circumstances the matter may be placed before the Chief Justice of India so that a bench can be constituted preferably in the first week of August.

The court, in its February 1 order, had noted, "When these matters were taken up, the respondents, in particular, the learned Attorney General and the learned Solicitor General appearing for the Union of India again brought to our notice the fact that a Bill called the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022, is on the anvil. It is their contention that the Bill would deal with all the aspects which are the subject-matter of the petitions before this court and their approach is that the matters may not be taken up for hearing."

Two students, Karmanya Singh Sareen and Shreya Sethi, had filed the plea against the contract entered into between WhatsApp and its parent Facebook to provide access to calls, photographs, texts, videos, and documents shared by users, claiming it was a violation of their privacy and free speech.

In May 2021, WhatsApp in a response to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology's letter had assured that the messaging service will not limit functionality for its users if they do not accept the new privacy policy update.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email