38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Ayodhya Dispute: Supreme Court Defers Hearing To January 10

By LawStreet News Network      04 January, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Ayodhya Dispute: Supreme Court Defers Hearing To January 10

The Supreme Court today i.e., January 4, 2019, has deferred the hearing on Ayodhya case till January 10, 2019.

A Bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S.K. Kaul said that a special Bench will be constituted to pass further orders in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case.

The special Bench will hear 14 separate petitions filed against the 2010 Allahabad High Court verdict ordering a three-way division of the 2.77-acre land on which the Babri Masjid stood before Hindutva activists demolished it on December 6, 1992.

On October 29, 2018, the apex court had adjourned the hearing in the first week of January before an "appropriate bench", which will decide the schedule of hearing. Later, an application was moved by the Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha (ABHM) for according an urgent hearing by advancing the date, but the top court had refused the plea, saying it had already passed an order on October 29, 2018, relating to the hearing on the matter.

Earlier, on September 27, 2018, the apex court Bench comprising of then Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and S. Abdul Nazeer by 2:1 majority had declined to refer to a five-judge Constitution Bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations made in 1994 judgment of Ismail Faruqui v. Union of India that a mosque was not integral to Islam which had arisen during the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

vande-mataram-at-150-constitutional-reverence-judicial-restraint-and-the-limits-of-legal-nationalism
Trending Know The Law
Vande Mataram at 150: Constitutional Reverence, Judicial Restraint, and the Limits of Legal Nationalism

At 150, Vande Mataram’s constitutional status, judicial restraint, and the limits of legal nationalism reveal India’s unresolved debate on law and reverence.

28 January, 2026 12:19 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-family-pension-for-remarried-childless-widow-of-crpf-personnel-parents-not-entitled
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Family Pension for Remarried Childless Widow of CRPF Personnel; Parents Not Entitled [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court rules that a remarried childless widow of a CRPF personnel remains entitled to family pension; dependent parents have no claim under Rule 54.

28 January, 2026 03:56 PM
iran-warns-of-unprecedented-retaliation-amid-renewed-us-threats-over-nuclear-program
Trending International
Iran Warns of Unprecedented Retaliation Amid Renewed U.S. Threats Over Nuclear Program

Iran warns of unprecedented retaliation as U.S. threats over its nuclear program intensify, raising legal, diplomatic, and geopolitical concerns.

29 January, 2026 11:51 AM
india-eu-free-trade-agreement-provokes-us-rebuke-over-russian-oil-ties
Trending International
India–EU Free Trade Agreement Provokes U.S. Rebuke Over Russian Oil Ties

India and the EU seal a historic FTA, drawing sharp U.S. criticism over Russian oil ties, tariffs, and shifting global trade and geopolitical alignments.

29 January, 2026 12:07 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email