38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, September 01, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Ayurvedic Doctors Entitled To Be Treated At Par With Allopathic Doctors Under NRHM/NHM Scheme : Supreme Court

By Akshat Bhat      28 March, 2022 06:57 PM      0 Comments
Ayurvedic Doctors Allopathic Doctors Supreme Court

On Thursday, the Supreme Court affirmed the Uttarakhand High Court's decision that Ayurvedic doctors will be paid at the same rate as allopathic and dental medical officers under the NRHM/NHM Scheme.

Justices Vineet Saran and J.K. Maheshwari of the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal against the High Court's decision.

However, this has been explained -

"However, we may only clarify that the respondents who are Ayurvedic doctors will be entitled to be treated at par with Allopathic Medical Officers and Dental Medical Officers under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM/NHM) Scheme."

Factual Background 

The National Rural Health Mission ("NRHM"), a sub-mission of the National Health Mission ("NHM"), was launched by the Union Government in 2015 to offer accessible, affordable, and high-quality health care to the rural people. Between 2010 and 2013, the responders worked for the Mission as Medical Officer, Ayush, on a contract basis. They were made members of the Rashtriya Bal Swasthya Karyakram (RBSK). Under the NRHM, the Uttarakhand State Government also hired contractual Allopathic, Dental, Ayurvedic, and Homeopathic Medical Officers. The salaries of allopathic and dental doctors differed significantly from those of ayurvedic and homoeopathic doctors. The responders had made representations requesting salary equity, but they had been unsuccessful. While rejecting their claims, the concerned authorities stated that they were not entitled to parity because they were working on a contract basis. The respondents had taken their grievances to the Uttarakhand High Court.

Contention Raised

The Ayurvedic Medical Officers (respondents) argued before the High Court that there was no salary disparity between allopathic and ayurvedic medical officers according to a government advertisement published in 2010. It was also asserted that the Ayurvedic and Allopathic Medical Officers had the same responsibilities.

Decision of the Uttrakhand High Court

The High Court noted that there was no intelligible differentia to consider the Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Medical Officers as a different class from the Allopathic and Dental Medical Officers

"There is no intelligible differentia so as to distinguish the Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Medical Officers viz-a-viz Allopathic and Dental Medical Officers. There is no rational why the similar situate persons have been discriminated against. The petitioners as well as Allopathic and Dental Medical Officers constitute homogenous class."

The High Court also noted that the nature of degrees and course lengths were nearly identical, and hence they could not be classed separately. The Court stated in Bhagwan Dass and Others v. State of Haryana and Others (1987) 4 SCC 643, that when the duties and functions of temporary appointees and regular cadre employees in the same Government Department are similar, salary parity cannot be denied based solely on the nature of their appointment. The High Court relied on the Supreme Court's ruling in State of Punjab v. Jagjit Singh And Ors. (2017) 1 SCC 148, which found that the concept of "same compensation for equal labour" applies to all employees, regardless of their position.

As a result, the High Court granted the respondents' appeal for salary parity on the grounds that the State Government's categorisation was arbitrary

"In the instant case, the duties discharged by the petitioners viz-a-viz Allopathic Medical Officers and Dental Medical Officers are of equal sensitivity and quality, even the responsibility and reliability are the same. The classification made by the State Government is irrational."



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-sets-up-sit-on-allegations-against-anant-ambani-vantara
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets up SIT on allegations against Anant Ambani's Vantara [Read Order]

SC forms SIT led by ex-judge J Chelameswar to probe allegations of illegal animal acquisition, mistreatment & financial irregularities at Anant Ambani’s Vantara.

26 August, 2025 01:57 PM
sc-deplores-high-courts-for-delaying-judgments-over-a-year
Trending Judiciary
SC Deplores High Courts for Delaying Judgments Over a Year [Read Judgment]

SC slams delay: Supreme Court deplores HCs for not delivering judgments for over a year after reserving cases, eroding faith in justice.

26 August, 2025 05:17 PM
cant-projects-judges-as-political-actors-ex-cjis-former-judges-rebut-statement
Trending Executive
'Can't projects judges as political actors,' ex CJIs, former judges rebut statement by ex judges on statement of Amit Shah [Read Statement]

56 former judges, including ex-CJIs Sathasivam & Gogoi, rebut peers’ statement on Amit Shah, stressing judiciary must stay above politics.

27 August, 2025 06:46 PM
supreme-court-appoints-two-new-judges-justice-alok-aradhe-and-future-cji-vipul-pancholi
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Appoints Two New Judges: Justice Alok Aradhe & Future CJI Vipul Pancholi

SC gets two new judges — Justices Alok Aradhe and Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, with Pancholi set to be CJI in 2031. Oath administered by CJI Gavai.

29 August, 2025 02:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email