38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 27, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Bail is rule, jail an exception' can be applied in UAPA cases: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      14 August, 2024 12:31 PM      0 Comments
Bail is rule jail an exception can be applied in UAPA cases SC

NEW DELHI: In a significant judgment, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said “bail is the rule and jail is an exception” is a settled law, which can be applied in cases registered under special law like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih said that when a case is made out, the courts should not have any hesitation in granting bail, though the allegations of the prosecution may be very serious.

The court allowed bail to Jalaluddin Khan, a retired Bihar police constable and an alleged member of Popular Front of India, arrested under the UAPA, for organising meetings at the first floor of house where directions were issued to the trained PFI members to attack and kill the selected targets, including suspended BJP member Nupur Sharma for making derogatory remarks against the religion and establish Islamic rule in the country by 2047.

The bench felt even in a case like the present one, where there are stringent conditions for the grant of bail in the relevant statutes, the rule holds good with only modification that the bail can be granted if the conditions in the statute are satisfied.

The court also emphasised that the rule also means that once a case is made out for the grant of bail, the court cannot decline to grant bail.

"If the courts start denying bail in deserving cases, it will be a violation of the rights guaranteed under Article 21 of our Constitution," the bench said.

The court found the Special Court and the High Court did not consider the material in the charge sheet objectively. Perhaps the focus was more on the activities of PFI, and therefore, the appellant's case could not be properly appreciated, it said.

Also Read: UAPA Tribunal confirms ban upon two J&K outfits

"The charge sheet does not mention the name of the terrorist organisation within the meaning of Section 2(m) of which the appellant was a member. We find that the PFI is not a terrorist organisation, as is evident from the first schedule," the bench said.

In the case, the court noted the charge sheet does not contain any material to show any connection of the appellant with PFI before letting out first floor premises to the other accused.

The court said the charge sheet described in detail the contents of the document styled “India 2047 Towards Rule of Islamic India”. However if the appellant intended to allow the conduct of the objectionable activities of PFI by giving first floor premises on rent, he would not have installed CCTV cameras, it said.

Referring to the statement of protected witness, the bench said, "We find that there was no discussion about the activities of PFI in the meeting held on May 29, 2022. According to the witness, the direction to kill Nupur Sharma was issued in June 2022 and not in the meeting of May 29, 2022."

The court said the charge sheet attributed certain statements to the protected witness, which he did not make. "NIA owes an explanation for that. The investigating machinery has to be fair," it said.

The bench noted there is no material produced on record to show that the appellant advocated, abetted, advised, or incited the commission of terrorist acts or any preparatory activity.

The appellant’s son conducted the negotiations for giving first floor of the house for rent and there is no allegation in the charge sheet against the appellant that he organised any camps to impart training in terrorism, it said.

"It is impossible to record a prima facie finding that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the accusation against the appellant of commission of offences under the UAPA was prima facie true. No antecedents of the appellant have been brought on record," the bench said.
 

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-permits-ramlila-at-school-playground-in-up
Trending Judiciary
SC permits Ramlila at school playground in UP

SC allows Ramlila at UP school ground, noting 100-year tradition, but urges finding alternate sites to keep playgrounds free for students.

26 September, 2025 12:08 AM
sc-stays-hcs-order-on-composition-of-sit-formed-to-probe-tirupati-parasadam-row
Trending Judiciary
SC stays HC's order on composition of SIT formed to probe Tirupati parasadam row

SC stays Andhra Pradesh HC order on SIT composition in Tirupati prasadam row, clarifying CBI Director’s role in appointing investigation officer.

26 September, 2025 07:53 PM

TOP STORIES

calcutta-hc-dismisses-plea-against-bengali-singer-for-allegedly-insulting-lord-ram-cites-lack-of-evidence
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses Plea Against Bengali Singer For Allegedly Insulting Lord Ram, Cites Lack of Evidence [Read Judgment]

Calcutta HC dismisses plea against singer Nachiketa Chakraborty over alleged remarks on Lord Ram, citing lack of evidence and jurisdiction.

22 September, 2025 10:43 AM
allahabad-hc-slams-police-for-recording-caste-of-accused-in-firs-terms-it-identity-profiling
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Slams Police for Recording Caste of Accused in FIRs, Terms It “Identity Profiling” [Read Order]

Allahabad HC condemns police for recording caste of accused in FIRs, calling it identity profiling that violates fundamental rights and constitutional values.

22 September, 2025 11:04 AM
spouse-may-claim-damages-for-marital-interference-by-third-party-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Spouse May Claim Damages for Marital Interference by Third Party: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC allows spouse to sue lover for ‘alienation of affection’, recognizing civil action for intentional interference in marriage.

22 September, 2025 01:06 PM
sc-notice-to-centre-others-on-plea-for-court-monitored-probe-into-air-india-crash
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to Centre, others on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash

SC issues notice on plea for court-monitored probe into Air India crash that killed 260; petitioner seeks independent, transparent, and fair investigation.

22 September, 2025 02:27 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email