New Delhi, India  
Judiciary

Ban On E-Cigarettes: Godfrey Philips Moves Bombay HC Challenging Seizure Ordered By Maharashtra FDA, Court Seeks States Reply [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      01 August, 2019 05:08 PM      0 Comments

The Bombay High Court on July 25, 2019, in the case of Godfrey Philips India Ltd. & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. has directed the State government and Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration to file their replies while hearing a writ petition filed by Godfrey Philips India Ltd challenging FDA's action of seizing e-cigarettes manufactured by the company.

A Division Bench of JusticesRanjit More and Bharati Dangre has passed an interim order restraining the Maharashtra FDA from taking coercive steps against the company until the next hearing.

State FDA Commissioner directed a ban on storage, manufacture, sale and distribution of e-cigarettes in the State following an advisory issued by the Union Ministry for Health and Family Welfare to State governments dated August 28, 2018, for ban on e-cigarettes.

On June 25, 2019, the State FDA had conducted an inspection of the stock stored in warehouses of the company and seized e-cigarettes. Pursuant to this, a show-cause notice was issued to the company on July 6, 2019, for violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, and Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Senior Counsel Amit Desai appearing for the company submitted that the said stock seized by State FDA is covered by an order of the Delhi High Court dated March 18, 2019, wherein Justice Vibhu Bakhru had ordered a stay on a circular issued by State Customs calling for a ban on import, manufacture, sale and distribution of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) like e-cigarettes, esheesha, vape, e-hookah with nicotine flavour etc.

Desai sought similar reliefs for the company and asked for the seized stocks to be released.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

right-to-trauma-care-is-an-integral-part-of-the-right-to-life-under-article-21-sc
Trending Judiciary
Right To Trauma Care Is An Integral Part Of The Right To Life Under Article 21: SC

Supreme Court holds trauma care is part of the right to life under Article 21, directs States and UTs to establish a uniform trauma care system.

29 May, 2026 01:10 PM
illicit-affair-alone-cannot-constitute-abetment-of-suicide-sc
Trending Judiciary
Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Constitute Abetment Of Suicide: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an illicit affair alone cannot constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC without proof of instigation or mens rea.

29 May, 2026 03:00 PM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email