38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Ban On E-Cigarettes: Godfrey Philips Moves Bombay HC Challenging Seizure Ordered By Maharashtra FDA, Court Seeks States Reply [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      01 August, 2019 05:08 PM      0 Comments

The Bombay High Court on July 25, 2019, in the case of Godfrey Philips India Ltd. & Anr. v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. has directed the State government and Maharashtra Food and Drug Administration to file their replies while hearing a writ petition filed by Godfrey Philips India Ltd challenging FDA's action of seizing e-cigarettes manufactured by the company.

A Division Bench of JusticesRanjit More and Bharati Dangre has passed an interim order restraining the Maharashtra FDA from taking coercive steps against the company until the next hearing.

State FDA Commissioner directed a ban on storage, manufacture, sale and distribution of e-cigarettes in the State following an advisory issued by the Union Ministry for Health and Family Welfare to State governments dated August 28, 2018, for ban on e-cigarettes.

On June 25, 2019, the State FDA had conducted an inspection of the stock stored in warehouses of the company and seized e-cigarettes. Pursuant to this, a show-cause notice was issued to the company on July 6, 2019, for violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, and Drug and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

Senior Counsel Amit Desai appearing for the company submitted that the said stock seized by State FDA is covered by an order of the Delhi High Court dated March 18, 2019, wherein Justice Vibhu Bakhru had ordered a stay on a circular issued by State Customs calling for a ban on import, manufacture, sale and distribution of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) like e-cigarettes, esheesha, vape, e-hookah with nicotine flavour etc.

Desai sought similar reliefs for the company and asked for the seized stocks to be released.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email