38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bar Council can't charge exorbitant fees for enrolment: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      30 July, 2024 03:47 PM      0 Comments
Bar Council can't charge exorbitant fees for enrolment: SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that the regulatory body, Bar Council of India and state bar councils cannot charge more than Rs 750 for advocates belonging to the general category and Rs 125 for advocates of SC/ST categories for their enrolment.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said the state bar councils cannot charge enrolment or miscellaneous fees above the amount prescribed.

The amount fixed cannot exceed Rs 750 for advocates belonging to the general category and Rs 125 for advocates for SC/ST categories

Pronouncing the judgment on behalf of the bench, the CJI said charging exorbitant fees created as barrier for entry into legal profession.

The judgment came on a batch of petitions filed by Gaurav Kumar and others challenging the exorbitant enrolment fees being charged by different state bar councils.

The court, however, clarified this judgment will have a prospective effect.

"The state bar councils are not required to refund the excess enrolment fee collected,” it said.

In the verdict, the court also made it clear that bar councils cannot charge enrolment fees beyond the express legal stipulation under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act.

The state bar councils and the BCI cannot demand fees other than the stipulated enrolment fee…dignity is crucial to substantive equality. The dignity of the individual encompasses the right of the individual to develop their potential to the fullest," the bench said.

"The right to pursue a profession is integral to the dignity of an individual. Charging exorbitant enrolment and miscellaneous fees as a precondition for enrolment creates a barrier to entry into the legal profession”, the bench added.

The bench pointed out that since the Parliament has specified the enrolment fee, the bar councils cannot violate it.

The court also said the BCI, the apex regulatory body for legal profession, and state bar councils can levy additional charges for the welfare and development work but cannot charge more than the fee stipulated under the Advocates Act.

The court noted that some state bar councils were charging as much as Rs 40,000 to enrol an advocate, which would lead to denial of opportunity to those lawyers who belong to poor, backward and marginalised sections of the population.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-to-consider-plea-against-invite-to-banu-mushtaq-to-inaugurate-mysuru-dasara-festival
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider plea against invite to Banu Mushtaq to inaugurate Mysuru Dasara festival

SC to hear plea challenging invite to Booker winner Banu Mushtaq as chief guest for Mysuru Dasara, citing religious rights and traditions.

18 September, 2025 01:20 PM
karta-of-huf-can-sell-joint-family-property-as-per-legal-necessity-sc
Trending Judiciary
'Karta' of HUF can sell joint family property as per legal necessity: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: ‘Karta’ of Hindu Undivided Family can sell joint family property for legal necessity, ruling depends on facts of each case.

18 September, 2025 01:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-asks-why-anti-pollution-measures-firecrackers-ban-for-delhi-alone
Trending Judiciary
SC asks why anti pollution measures, firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

SC questions why firecracker bans, anti-pollution steps apply only to Delhi; stresses need for uniform clean air policy across India.

13 September, 2025 10:43 AM
delhi-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-abhishek-bachchans-personality-rights
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Restrains Unauthorised Use Of Abhishek Bachchan’s Personality Rights [Read Order]

Delhi HC restrains misuse of Abhishek Bachchan’s personality rights, orders removal of unauthorized content, citing dignity & economic harm.

13 September, 2025 12:42 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-cbfc-ban-on-film-masoom-kaatil-for-promoting-vigilantism-communal-disharmony
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC Upholds CBFC Ban on Film ‘Masoom Kaatil’ for Promoting Vigilantism, Communal Disharmony [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds CBFC’s refusal to certify ‘Masoom Kaatil’, citing vigilantism, communal disharmony, gore and risk to social harmony.

13 September, 2025 01:02 PM
grandchild-cannot-claim-share-in-grandparents-property-if-parents-are-alive-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Grandchild Cannot Claim Share In Grandparents Property If Parents Are Alive: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Grandchildren have no automatic right to grandparents’ property if parents are alive: Delhi HC clears misconception

15 September, 2025 10:34 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email