38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 31, 2024
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bar Council can't charge exorbitant fees for enrolment: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Singh      30 July, 2024 03:47 PM      0 Comments
Bar Council can't charge exorbitant fees for enrolment: SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that the regulatory body, Bar Council of India and state bar councils cannot charge more than Rs 750 for advocates belonging to the general category and Rs 125 for advocates of SC/ST categories for their enrolment.

A bench of Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said the state bar councils cannot charge enrolment or miscellaneous fees above the amount prescribed.

The amount fixed cannot exceed Rs 750 for advocates belonging to the general category and Rs 125 for advocates for SC/ST categories

Pronouncing the judgment on behalf of the bench, the CJI said charging exorbitant fees created as barrier for entry into legal profession.

The judgment came on a batch of petitions filed by Gaurav Kumar and others challenging the exorbitant enrolment fees being charged by different state bar councils.

The court, however, clarified this judgment will have a prospective effect.

"The state bar councils are not required to refund the excess enrolment fee collected,” it said.

In the verdict, the court also made it clear that bar councils cannot charge enrolment fees beyond the express legal stipulation under Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act.

The state bar councils and the BCI cannot demand fees other than the stipulated enrolment fee…dignity is crucial to substantive equality. The dignity of the individual encompasses the right of the individual to develop their potential to the fullest," the bench said.

"The right to pursue a profession is integral to the dignity of an individual. Charging exorbitant enrolment and miscellaneous fees as a precondition for enrolment creates a barrier to entry into the legal profession”, the bench added.

The bench pointed out that since the Parliament has specified the enrolment fee, the bar councils cannot violate it.

The court also said the BCI, the apex regulatory body for legal profession, and state bar councils can levy additional charges for the welfare and development work but cannot charge more than the fee stipulated under the Advocates Act.

The court noted that some state bar councils were charging as much as Rs 40,000 to enrol an advocate, which would lead to denial of opportunity to those lawyers who belong to poor, backward and marginalised sections of the population.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

The Orissa High Court has been without a permanent chief justice since January 5, 2020 after the retirement of former Chief Justice, KS Jhaveri. The high court is currently headed by acting Chief Justice Sanju Panda.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-tells-ncp-led-by-ajit-pawar-to-declare-use-of-clock-symbol-sub-judice
Trending Judiciary
SC tells NCP led by Ajit Pawar to declare use of Clock symbol sub judice

SC directs Ajit Pawar-led NCP to declare ‘Clock’ symbol use as sub judice in all election materials, pending final court ruling on its rightful ownership.

25 October, 2024 11:12 AM
justice-sanjiv-khanna-to-take-oath-as-chief-justice-of-india-on-nov-11-2024
Trending Legal Insiders
Justice Sanjiv Khanna to take oath as Chief Justice of India on Nov 11, 2024 [Read Notification]

Justice Sanjiv Khanna appointed as the 51st Chief Justice of India, succeeding CJI Chandrachud, with a tenure starting on November 11, 2024.

25 October, 2024 11:17 AM
sc-grants-bail-to-businessman-in-delhi-liquor-policy-scam-case
Trending Judiciary
SC grants bail to businessman in Delhi liquor policy scam case

Supreme Court grants bail to businessman Amandeep Singh Dhall in Delhi liquor policy scam case, noting the lengthy trial process with over 300 witnesses.

25 October, 2024 04:11 PM
sc-dismisses-ex-jharkhand-cms-plea-for-suspension-of-conviction-to-allow-him-contest-assembly-polls
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses ex Jharkhand CM's plea for suspension of conviction to allow him contest Assembly polls

The Supreme Court rejects ex-Jharkhand CM Madhu Koda’s plea to stay his conviction, barring him from contesting the upcoming Assembly elections.

25 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email