38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Being quasi judicial, tribunal can't direct formulation of policy: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      29 December, 2023 11:19 AM      0 Comments
Being quasi judicial tribunal cant direct formulation of policy Supreme Court

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said the Armed Forces Tribunal is a quasi judicial body, which is not empowered to direct the government to formulate a policy for promotion in a particular manner affecting the services of the personnel as making a policy is not in the domain of the judiciary.

A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Sanjay Karol said the tribunal is also a quasi-judicial body, functioning within the parameters set out in the governing legislation.

"Although, it cannot be questioned that disputes in respect of promotions and/or filling up of vacancies is within the jurisdiction of the tribunal, it cannot direct those responsible for making policy, to make a policy in a particular manner," the bench said.

In its December 14 judgment, the court quashed and set aside an order by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi directing the Centre to permit Air Commodore N K Sharma to function as JAG (Judge Advocate General) (Air) till such time that the formulation of a policy for filling up the possession of AVM (Air Vice Marshal) takes place, and giving him an opportunity to be considered under such a policy.

The court said that the respondents challenge was barred at first instance, since he participated in the promotion board of 2015 and only challenged the non-formation of a policy for filling up the vacancy of AVM JAG (Air), finding himself to be unsuccessful in securing a promotion.

The Union government said the direction was against public policy as it would allow the officer to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation, i e, 57 years. It also said the tribunal could not direct that a person should be considered for promotion in particular manner or in terms of a new policy, framed upon such direction.

The officer, for his part, said the direction is not against the proposition of law that a person does not have the right to be promoted but has the right to be considered for promotion.

In view of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the bench said legislature has laid out in considerable detail, its functioning and for the purposes of adjudication of dispute before it.

The bench also said it has been observed time and again that a court cannot direct for a legislation or a policy to be made.

"It only stands to reason that a tribunal functioning within the strict boundaries of the governing legislation, would not have the power to direct the formation of a policy. After all, a court in Writ jurisdiction is often faced with situations that allegedly fly in the face of fundamental rights, and yet, has not been entrusted with the power to direct such formation of policy," the bench said.

The bench also said it only stands to reason then, that, a tribunal subject to the High Courts jurisdiction under Article 226, cannot be permitted by law, to direct the framing of policy by the government.

Justice Karol, who authored the judgment on behalf of the bench, highlighted that it has been observed time and again that a court cannot direct for a legislation or a policy to be made.

Referring to the apex courts judgment in 'Union of India vs Ilmo Devi and others' (2021), the bench said, After all, a court in writ jurisdiction is often faced with situations that allegedly fly in the face of fundamental rights, and yet, has not been entrusted with the power to direct such formation of policy".

The bench said that a tribunal subject to the high courts jurisdiction under Article 226, cannot be permitted by law, to direct the framing of policy by the government.
 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

father-of-deceased-pilot-in-ahmedabad-crash-moves-sc-for-court-monitored-probe
Trending Judiciary
Father of deceased pilot in Ahmedabad crash moves SC for court monitored probe

91-year-old father of pilot killed in Ahmedabad Air India crash moves SC seeking court-monitored probe into alleged biased and flawed investigation.

17 October, 2025 10:54 AM
child-cant-consent-to-sex-life-imprisonment-upheld-for-sexual-assault-on-minor-girl-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Can’t Consent to Sex — Life Imprisonment Upheld for Sexual Assault on Minor Girl: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC upholds life imprisonment for assault on minor SC girl, reiterating that a child cannot consent to sex; school records key for age proof.

17 October, 2025 11:45 AM
sc-criticizes-casual-declaration-of-witnesses-as-hostile-upholds-conviction-under-sc-st-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticizes Casual Declaration of Witnesses as Hostile, Upholds Conviction under SC/ST Act [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court slams casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile; upholds life imprisonment in SC/ST Act case involving rape of minor girl.

17 October, 2025 11:55 AM
delhi-hc-quashes-22-year-old-complaint-against-advocate-reiterates-that-a-lawyers-office-is-not-a-commercial-activity
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Quashes 22-Year Old Complaint Against Advocate, Reiterates That A Lawyer’s Office Is Not A Commercial Activity [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC quashes 22-year-old complaint against advocate, rules that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial activity under MDP 2001 and Building Bye-Laws.

17 October, 2025 01:42 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email