38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, July 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Delhi Court Adjourns Bhim Army Chiefs Application Till Jan 21 For Modification Of Bail Conditions

By LawStreet News Network      18 January, 2020 09:01 PM      0 Comments
Delhi Court Adjourns Bhim Army Chiefs Application Till Jan 21 For Modification Of Bail Conditions

The Tis Hazari Court of Delhi has adjourned Bhim Army Chief, Chandrashekhar Azads application challenging the bail conditions imposed on him directing him to leave Delhi for 4 weeks in lieu of the upcoming elections. The next hearing is scheduled for January 21, 2020. 

The Court on January 15, 2020 had directed  Azad to leave Delhi for 4 weeks. Additional Sessions Judge, Kamini Lau had said she does not want any interference with the elections. The Court further said that Azad had to mark his presence with SHO in Saharanpur every Saturday for the next 4 weeks.

The Court had earlier that day reserved its order on Chandrashekhar Azads bail plea. He was in custody regarding the Daryaganj Violence case. Delhi Police contended that the permission for a dharna was sought but not given. 

The Court in the earlier hearing had censured the Delhi Police for failing to show any proof against Azad while hearing his bail application on January 14, 2020. While hearing the case, Judge Kamini Lau had observed that individuals are out on the streets since things which ought to have been said inside Parliament were not said.

She had questioned the Delhi police and stated, You are carrying on as if Jama Masjid is Pakistan. Regardless of whether it was Pakistan, you can go there and fight. Pakistan was a piece of unified India.

Mr. Azad was sent to judicial custody on December 21, 2019 by a Delhi Court. The court asked the investigation officials to put all proof against Azad that demonstrated the charge that he was giving provocative speeches at an event in Jama Masjid. Accordingly, the provision stated, We have drone footage and also evidences showing Azad giving an inflammatory speech. 

Nonetheless, the police told the court they have just drone pictures as proof and no other chronicle. In light of absence of proof, the judge stated, Do you think Delhi police is so backward that it has no tools to record anything?

The judge hammered Delhi Police for the clampdown on the dissent and stated, Give me anything or any law that restricts such assembling. Where is the brutality? Who says you can't dissent? Have you perused the Constitution? It is one's Constitutional right to dissent. 

The court had additionally observed that Azad, having a law degree, could likewise dissent inside the courts and noticed that Azads Ambedkarite reasoning presumably required more research. The Court had opined, Azad is probably an Ambedkarite. Ambedkar was closer to the Muslims, Sikhs and basically the repressed class of the society... He was a rebel of his own kind. Probably Azad has a vague idea of what he wants to say but probably not able to put it across. If you take up an issue, you do your research. And that is missing!



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-comes-down-heavily-on-use-of-offensive-language-in-social-media
Trending Judiciary
SC comes down heavily on use of offensive language in social media

SC slams use of abusive language on social media; warns petitioner over objectionable posts on PM Modi, RSS, says state free to act if conduct continues.

16 July, 2025 03:30 PM
sc-declines-plea-for-premature-release-of-convict-in-triple-murder-linked-to-terror-act
Trending Judiciary
SC declines plea for premature release of convict in triple murder linked to terror act

SC refuses premature release of triple murder convict linked to terror; allows challenge to J&K remission policy in pending case.

16 July, 2025 03:35 PM

TOP STORIES

s-31-of-dv-act-not-to-apply-for-breach-of-maintenance-order-ktka-hc
Trending Judiciary
S 31 of DV Act not to apply for breach of maintenance order: Ktka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka HC rules Sec 31 of DV Act applies only to protection orders, not maintenance breaches under Sec 20; sets aside woman’s plea against husband.

12 July, 2025 06:06 PM
plea-in-sc-seeks-stay-on-order-to-display-qr-code-for-eatery-owners-on-kanwar-yatra-route
Trending Judiciary
Plea in SC seeks stay on order to display QR code for eatery owners on Kanwar Yatra route

Plea in SC seeks stay on UP-Uttarakhand order mandating QR codes to reveal eatery owners’ identity along Kanwar Yatra route, citing privacy violation.

12 July, 2025 06:15 PM
on-scs-rebuke-cartoonist-agrees-to-delete-objectionable-posts-on-pm-rss
Trending Judiciary
On SC's rebuke, Cartoonist agrees to delete objectionable posts on PM, RSS

SC slams cartoonist Hemant Malviya for objectionable post on PM Modi, RSS; he agrees to delete it after court questions his inflammatory conduct.

14 July, 2025 04:06 PM
trying-best-but-nothing-much-can-be-done-centre-to-sc-on-kerala-nurses-execution
Trending Judiciary
Trying best but nothing much can be done, Centre to SC on Kerala nurse's execution

Centre tells SC it tried through private channels to save Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya from Yemen execution, but says “nothing much can be done”.

14 July, 2025 04:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email