38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Blast From The Past: Delhi HC Makes Parking Free At Malls, Hospitals etc [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      10 April, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Blast From The Past: Delhi HC Makes Parking Free At Malls, Hospitals etc [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court on February 19, 2018, in the case of Sanjey Puri v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation had made parking free at shopping malls, hospitals and other commercial establishments.

A Bench comprising of then Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar was hearing a petition filed by a city resident seeking direction to the South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC) to take appropriate legal steps against persons responsible for illegally charging parking fees from the general public.

Ms. Monika Arora, learned standing counsel for SDMC had drawn the attention of the court to the circular dated February 5, 2016, and the public notice issued on December 2, 2015, in respect of misuse of parking areas in the commercial complexes offices/shopping malls/hospitals. These Circulars pointed out that parking space in the commercial complexes/Malls/Hospitals has to be utilised free of any charges and cannot be put to commercial use by levying parking fees for the same.

The learned standing counsel submitted before the court that when the misuse by certain complexes was brought to its notice, the SDMC has issued notices to show cause to such complexes and also effected sealing of certain malls. This has resulted in such Complexes/Malls initiating challenges to the action of the Municipal Corporation by way of writ petitions which are pending before the Single Judge.

Noting the submission made by the counsel, the court said that it would appear that the Municipal Corporation is conscious of its statutory duty and appears to have taken action against the violators of the law.

The court granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the Municipal Corporation in case any violation comes to his notice and directed the Municipal Corporation to take action on the same. Moreover, the court also granted liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate action before this court as and when the Municipal Corporation fails to take action.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email