38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

‘Blot on constitutional spirit,' SC on disrobing of women over witchcraft allegations [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      21 December, 2024 11:50 AM      0 Comments
‘Blot on constitutional spirit,' SC on disrobing of women over witchcraft allegations

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has denounced disrobing and public humiliation of two women in Bihar accusing them of practising witchcraft, saying such incidents go against the concept of dignity and are a blot on the constitutional spirit.

A bench of Justices C T Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol said its conscience was shaken on the fact that a woman was physically abused and disrobed in public over allegations of witchcraft, saying when it comes to equality, much remains to be achieved, especially to women in rural areas.

Supreme Court Slams Bihar Witchcraft Allegations: A Blot on Constitutional Values

The court pointed out dignity goes to the very core of the existence of an individual in society and any action which undermines dignity either by an act of another person or that of the state is potentially going against the spirit of the Constitution, which guarantees the security of all persons by ensuring that justice, liberty and equality are avouched for each and every person.

By extension, if the dignity of a person is compromised, their human rights, available to them by virtue of them being humans and guaranteed by various enactments, both national and international, are imperilled, the bench said.

Public Disrobing of Women in Bihar: SC Orders Resumption of Trial Proceedings

“When such rights of a woman are threatened, the danger is comparatively greater, for despite advancement by great leaps and bounds, when it comes to equality, much remains to be achieved, especially when it comes to women in rural areas,” the bench felt.

Acting on a plea by the complainant against the Patna High Court's order staying the criminal proceedings, the bench said this court is aghast as to how the High Court, in its wisdom, saw it fit to grant a stay against proceedings qua the accused persons, in such a callous and unreasoned manner.

"A court granting a stay of proceedings is not to grant a stay in a mechanical manner. The sum total of circumstances both for and against need to be examined to check as to whether a prima facie case for stay is made out or not, or in other words, whether the non-grant of stay is to somehow prejudice the party, etc," the bench said.

The bench noted that the FIR showed that the victim was subjected to grave accusations and also disrobed and assaulted in public, which undoubtedly is an affront to her dignity.

“The reality that such acts are still a part of 21st century life is a fact that has shaken the conscience of this court,” the bench said.

The court said when it comes to offences that infringe upon the dignity of a person, the responsibility cast on both the investigating and the adjudicatory authorities is greater than usual or what is generally cast upon them in other circumstances.

The bench said given the vulgarity of what the two women had to endure, “we may say nothing more but express our surprise as to why the state chose not to assail the non-speaking order of the High Court granting stay in favour of the accused before this court”.

On the state government's failure to challenge the stay, the bench said the state’s decision to litigate an issue should not depend on the benefit that may be derived either to the state exchequer or elsewhere but also should be reflected in its responsibility to protect, within its people the respect for the rule of law and justice for all.

“Incidents such as the one before us, as also many others that come across our desks, keep us alive to the on-ground reality that however much has been done by way of legislative, executive and judicial action to protect vulnerable sections of the society, in this context women, from exploitation, its effect has not permeated to the grassroot level,” the bench said.

The bench noted that as per the NCRB data, 85 cases relating to witchcraft were reported in 2022, and, in preceding years, the numbers were 68, 88 and 102 respectively.

“Although the numbers referred to above may seem insignificant, however, even 102 or 85, whatever the number may be, of reported inhumane, degrading incidents, each of them is a blot on the constitutional spirit,” the bench said.

The court disposed of the matter after being informed that the plea before the High Court was withdrawn on November 22, 2024.

The incident occurred in March 2020 in Champaran district in Bihar. As many as 13 persons were accused of assaulting the grandmother of the complainant, accusing her of practising witchcraft. They also attacked another woman who intervened to rescue.

The FIR was registered under various sections of IPC and Section 3&4 of the Witch (Daain) Act against 13 persons only after a recourse was taken under Section 156(3) of the CrPC.

The police filed chargesheet upon only against one person but the magistrate took cognisance against all the accused. The sessions court upheld the order but the High Court stayed the proceedings in a quashing petition filed by the accused.

The bench directed all the accused to appear on January 15, 2025 before the trial court for day-to-day proceedings.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-upholds-joint-insolvency-proceedings-against-interlinked-real-estate-companies
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Joint Insolvency Proceedings Against Interlinked Real Estate Companies [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds joint insolvency proceedings against interlinked real estate companies, allowing a single IBC petition for linked projects.

04 February, 2026 11:38 AM
sc-holds-courts-can-extend-arbitrators-mandate-even-after-award-is-rendered-clarifies-scope-of-section-29a-of-arbitration-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Courts Can Extend Arbitrator’s Mandate Even After Award Is Rendered, Clarifies Scope of Section 29A of Arbitration Act

Supreme Court rules courts can extend arbitrator’s mandate even after award, clarifying Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

04 February, 2026 12:53 PM
if-you-cant-follow-our-constitution-leave-india-supreme-court-to-meta-whatsapp-on-privacy-policy
Trending Judiciary
If You Can’t Follow Our Constitution, Leave India: Supreme Court to Meta, WhatsApp on Privacy Policy

Supreme Court warns Meta and WhatsApp to follow India’s Constitution or leave, slams privacy policy and data sharing with Meta companies.

04 February, 2026 01:30 PM
sc-to-rule-on-trump-era-emergency-tariffs-as-broader-us-tariff-landscape-shifts
Trending Judiciary
SC to Rule on Trump-Era Emergency Tariffs as Broader U.S. Tariff Landscape Shifts

Supreme Court to review Trump-era emergency tariffs under IEEPA, a ruling that could reshape U.S. trade policy and impact global markets and importers.

04 February, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email