38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay High Court Waives Statutory Period in Case of Divorce by Mutual Consent

By M V Manasa      19 November, 2020 01:58 PM      0 Comments
Bombay HC Mutual Divorce

The Bombay High Court approved a joint plea for waiver of the statutory period before the divorce by mutual consent and gave the order while considering the circumstances of the present case, where the woman was pregnant with another mans child. In 2014, the divorcing parties registered their marriage and initiated divorce proceedings in the Family Court earlier in the year 2020 under Section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. But however, the Family Court denied waiving off the statutory period of six months which is provided under Section 13 B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The period of six months is given to the couple before granting them divorce to rethink and contemplate over their decisions because the Court can only grant the divorce when there is no chance of a reconciliation of the marriage.

In this present case, both the parties were living separately since December 2018. And as both the parties are unable to live together, with mutual consent they decided to dissolve the marriage. The petitioners counsel stated the urgency of the matter as the petitioner was pregnant with another mans child and she intended to marry and settle as soon as possible due to which it was important that the statutory period be waived. The respondent also agreed to the petitioners submissions and supported the waiver of the statutory period. He further submitted that as the parties are already residing separately and already attended the councilor, the waiver of the period was only appropriate.

Single-Judge bench of Justice Nitin W Sambre referred to the Supreme Court case of Amandeep Singh v Harveen Kaur, where it was held that the statutory period was not mandatory but only directory which granted the Court discretion to waive the statutory period in certain cases where  there is no possibility of parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation

In the present case, considering the circumstances, the Court said,

In the aforesaid backdrop, it will be appropriate in the fitness of things, particularly having regard to the medical/health condition of the Petitioner, to allow the joint application moved for waiving the period as specified under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. the court allowed the joint request and quashed the impugned order waiving the statutory period of 6 months. The court allowing the petition remarked regarding the divorce case in the family court that Let the Family Court decide the application for divorce as expeditiously as possible and if required by directing parties to attend the Family Court Proceedings physically or through video conferencing as it deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cannot-penalise-lawyers-for-attending-court-despite-boycott-calls-tripura-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Penalise Lawyers For Attending Court Despite Boycott Calls: Tripura HC [Read Order]

Tripura High Court held that Bar Associations cannot penalise advocates for appearing in court despite boycott calls by lawyers’ bodies.

18 May, 2026 03:57 PM
tcs-posh-panel-member-denied-bail-in-nashik-harassment-case
Trending Business
TCS POSH Panel Member Denied Bail in Nashik Harassment Case [Read Order]

Nashik court denied bail to a TCS POSH panel member in a workplace harassment case, citing alleged inaction on repeated complaints.

18 May, 2026 04:10 PM

TOP STORIES

punjab-and-haryana-hc-lifts-ban-on-zee5-documentary-on-lawrence-bishnoi-sets-aside-centres-advisory
Trending CelebStreet
Punjab and Haryana HC Lifts Ban on ZEE5 Documentary on Lawrence Bishnoi, Sets Aside Centre’s Advisory [Read Order]

Punjab and Haryana High Court lifts ban on ZEE5’s Lawrence Bishnoi documentary, quashes Centre’s advisory over lack of legal basis.

13 May, 2026 03:33 PM
deliberate-institutional-blindness-jharkhand-high-court-slams-illegal-mining-in-hazaribagh-issues-15-sweeping-directions
Trending Judiciary
“Deliberate Institutional Blindness”: Jharkhand High Court Slams Illegal Mining in Hazaribagh, Issues 15 Sweeping Directions [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court issues 15 directions on illegal mining in Hazaribagh, holding continued inaction despite surveillance violates Article 21.

13 May, 2026 04:17 PM
sc-quashes-35-year-old-criminal-case-flags-crisis-of-undertrial-delay-in-uttar-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes 35-Year-Old Criminal Case, Flags Crisis of Undertrial Delay in Uttar Pradesh [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes a 35-year-old criminal case, calls undertrial delays a violation of Article 21, and seeks data on UP’s justice backlog.

13 May, 2026 04:28 PM
wifes-pursuit-of-professional-career-cannot-be-branded-as-matrimonial-cruelty-or-desertion-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Pursuit of Professional Career Cannot Be Branded as Matrimonial Cruelty or Desertion: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court held that a wife pursuing her career cannot be termed cruel or accused of desertion, calling such views patriarchal and regressive.

13 May, 2026 05:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email