38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 07, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay HC Refuses Permission For Procession To Lord Vitthal Temple On Ashadhi Ekadashi

By Tanurag Ghosh      03 July, 2020 08:18 PM      0 Comments
Bombay HC Refuses Permission for Religious Procession in Plea requesting participation of 100 members in a six-kilometer march carrying Sant DyaneshwarsPalkhi bearing Padukas

The pandemic induced lockdown in India has brought with it multiple controversies. From breach of rules by a religious congregation in Delhi to the Supreme Court allowing a religious procession to proceed without social distancing, these events have been under extraordinary public scrutiny with supporters vocalizing their support and critics voicing their opinions. Another event has been added to this list as observed by the High Court of Bombay.

In a matter on hand, the court recently refused to grant any relief to the WarkariSeva Sangh which had submitted a petition requesting permission for 100 members to participate in a six-kilometer procession carrying Sant DyaneshwarsPalkhi bearing Padukas (footwear) of the revered saint. The event was supposed to take place on the outskirts of Pandharpurain Solapur in the temple of Lord Vitthal.

The court held that in light of the prevailing circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic, the decision of local administration was sufficient. The local administration and the temple committee decided to cancel the annual event and permit only 20 people to accompany the Palkhi on a state transport bus to the temple. 

The matter was heard by the bench od Justice Varale and Justice Tavade. Advocate Mihir Govilkar, the petitioners lawyer informed the bench that the tradition had been unbroken since it began irrespective of events like wars, famines, floods, or droughts. Representing WarkariSeva Sangh of Pune through its president Kishore Kamathe and others, he submitted that the Sangh had written to the Pune Divisional Commissioner seeking permission for the procession on 28th May 2020. As there was no reply to the application, the Sangh decided to approach the High Court.

The petition submitted that the participating devotees were willing to maintain social distancing and other guidelines along with providing a list of devotees who would accompany the Palkhi along with their COVID-19 test results. It sought directions from the court to allow 100 devotees of the Sangh to undertake the procession and also allow them to take a holy dip in the Chandrabhaga river on 1st July 2020 along with performing Nagar Pradakshina and other rituals for Ashadhi Ekadashi.

After hearing the submissions and receiving the details of the authorities regarding preparations for the festival, the court held that the decision of carrying the procession with 20 people was sufficient and disposed of the petition.

The procession in the matter would take place in Maharashtra, the region with the highest number of infections in the country. With such a situation prevailing in all districts of the state, mass participation of people in processions would lead to an increased risk of transmission of the virus and lead to further loss of lives.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-rules-adopted-child-with-unknown-parentage-inherits-caste-of-adoptive-parents
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Rules Adopted Child With Unknown Parentage Inherits Caste of Adoptive Parents [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court held that an adopted child with unknown parentage acquires the caste of adoptive parents and is entitled to caste validity.

02 February, 2026 11:11 AM
ugc-regulations-on-vice-chancellor-selection-binding-state-law-deviation-illegal-sc
Trending Judiciary
UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor Selection Binding; State Law Deviation Illegal: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor selection binding, strikes down state law deviation, but allows incumbent to complete tenure under Article 142.

02 February, 2026 12:16 PM
bombay-hc-holds-section-9-cannot-be-used-to-fasten-liability-on-non-signatory-once-foreign-award-is-held-unenforceable
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Section 9 Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Non-Signatory Once Foreign Award Is Held Unenforceable [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC holds Section 9 cannot fasten liability on a non-signatory once a foreign arbitral award is held unenforceable against it.

02 February, 2026 12:21 PM
madras-hc-bans-construction-at-heritage-temples-across-tamil-nadu-until-heritage-commission-is-formed
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bans Construction at Heritage Temples Across Tamil Nadu Until Heritage Commission Is Formed [Read Order]

Madras High Court bans civil construction at heritage temples across Tamil Nadu until the State Heritage Commission is constituted and becomes functional.

02 February, 2026 12:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email