38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, July 01, 2024
Judiciary

Bombay HC terminates Hitachi employee for ‘provocative’ Facebook posts

By Rintu Mariam      13 December, 2023 06:00 PM      0 Comments

MUMBAI: A Labour Court ruling that had overturned an employee’s termination for two "provocative" Facebook posts against the employer company has been overturned by the Bombay High Court.

“Freedom of speech and expression cannot be allowed to be transgressed beyond reasonableness. If that is allowed, it could lead to disastrous consequences. In a given case, one cannot and should not wait for the consequences to occur. Such acts itself are required to be nipped in the bud. Otherwise, it would convey a wrong signal to the society at large”, Justice Milind N Jadhav observed. 

The Court was hearing a plea by Hitachi Astemo Fie Pvt. Ltd, which challenged an order by the Labour Court, Pune, that had quashed and set aside the termination of Nirajkumar Prabhakarrao Kadu. He was an office-bearer of a recognised union of the company. 

Two posts that Kadu made on his Facebook account during the salary settlement dispute were deemed by the company to be derogatory and meant to damage its reputation.

In April, 2018, an Enquiry Officer of the company held Kadu guilty of misconduct and his services were terminated through dismissal order. Challenging this, Kadu approached the Labour Court. 

The Labour Court said that though misconduct was committed by the Respondent – workman, but since it has had no adverse effect, the argument that the response to the two Facebook posts was "likely to be violent" can't be accepted. The Court then quashed the termination order.

The Court however did not agree with this finding. 

“Though it was vehemently argued that no untoward incident had taken place, merely because no incident has taken place, it cannot be a ground for discharging the act of posting the defamatory and provocative posts made by the Respondent – workman,” the Court held. 

“In fact, a clear nexus is made out between the two Facebook posts posted by the Respondent – workman and the misconduct levelled against him. It is seen that, the two posts were in fact directed against the Petitioner - Company with a clear intent to incite hatred and were provocative. This clearly stands proven," it added.

The Court further noted that posting such posts on the Facebook account and the comments received are clearly an act of inciting hated and passion against the management. The Respondent – workman initially refused to accept that he had posted the two Facebook posts. However, in the evidence that was produced before the Labour Court, the Respondent – workman failed to produce evidence supporting his argument. 

“……on the basis of the two Facebook posts posted by Respondent – workman, hatred and passion was clearly incited clearly amongst those who have given the likes and comments and one such comment incited the passion to such an extent that it stated that, ‘atleast 2-3 persons from the management should be assaulted with swords’, the bench noted. 

Prima facie, the Court noted that a serious comment of taking resort to weapons and assaulting the management personnel was commented upon in reply to the first Facebook post. 

“Language used by the Respondent – workman in the two Facebook posts clearly amounts to commission of an act which is subversive of discipline or good behaviour on the premises of the establishment when the aforementioned clauses of the Model Standing Order are broadly interpreted”, the Court wrote.

Before closing, the High Court added that “a much greater degree of restraint” was expected from the office-bearers of the union who held active parleys with the company for wage settlement issues. However, if such restraint is not practiced, “such acts cannot / should not be pardoned,” the Court said. 

On these grounds, the Court held the Labour Court's verdict as unsustainable. 

“As a consequence it is held that, the enquiry conducted against Respondent - workman was absolutely fair and proper and the findings returned by the Enquiry Officer are upheld as being proper. The Writ Petition succeeds," the Court concluded.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release Kedarnath Movie: Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL To Stay Release

The Bombay High Court on December 6, 2018, dismissed a petition filed against upcoming movie Kedarnath seeking a direction to stay the release of the movie

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order] Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband [Read Order]

Husband Can Also Claim Alimony/Maintenance From Wife: Bombay High Court Orders Woman To Pay Alimony To Ex-Husband || "It is open for the court to decide the application filed by the husband under Section 25 of the 1955 Act, seeking monthly maintenance, by way of final proceedings, pending which, the application for interim maintenance filed under Section 24 of the Act of 1955, has been rightly entertained by the learned Judge and the husband has been held entitled to interim maintenance while the proceedings under Section 25 are pending," she noted.

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief

Maharashtra Cabinet Minister Nawab Malik Approaches Supreme Court Against ED Arrest After Bombay High Court Refuses Relief || "There is something or the other going against every leader of the NCP, Congress and Shiv Sena... Prime Minister Narendra Modi has one thing in mind: he wants BJP rule from Kashmir to Kanyakumari, irrespective of the wishes of the people," Pawar said.

Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By  Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist Salman Khan Approaches Bombay High Court Challenging Summons By Lower Court Against Complaint of a Journalist

The magistrate court issues the process if it finds prima facie substance in the allegations made in the complaint. Once the process is issued, the accused persons have to appear before the court.

TRENDING NEWS


Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /home/lawstreet/public_html/trending-top-stories-sidebar.php on line 8

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-to-pronounce-order-on-ed-plea-seeking-stay-on-kejriwals-bail-today
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC to pronounce order on ED plea seeking stay on Kejriwal’s bail today

Delhi HC to pronounce order on ED’s plea to stay CM Arvind Kejriwal’s bail today, following arguments on procedural irregularities in money laundering case.

25 June, 2024 10:33 AM
non-participants-in-tender-process-cannot-challenge-award-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Non Participants in Tender Process Cannot Challenge Award: Delhi HC [Read Judgement]

Delhi High Court rules non-participants in tender processes lack standing to challenge awards, dismissing Primatel Fibcom Ltd’s petition against IOCL’s tender.

25 June, 2024 12:19 PM
kerala-legislative-assembly-passes-resolution-to-rename-state-to-keralam
Trending Executive
Kerala Legislative Assembly Passes Resolution to Rename State to ‘Keralam’

Kerala Legislative Assembly passes resolution to rename the state ‘Keralam,’ seeking a Constitutional amendment for official recognition of the Malayalam name.

25 June, 2024 01:28 PM
sc-rejects-ex-delhi-ministers-plea-to-consider-his-bail-plea
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects ex Delhi Minister's plea to consider his bail plea

SC rejects ex-Delhi Minister Satyendar Kumar Jain’s bail plea, urging Delhi HC to decide on July 9 without delays. Jain’s request to tag plea denied.

25 June, 2024 03:41 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email