38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay HC To Hear Petitions by Sanjay Leela Bhansali Seeking Injunction Against Eros Media

By Manthan Pandit      24 June, 2020 08:33 PM      0 Comments
Bombay HC To Hear Petitions by Sanjay Leela Bhansali Seeking Injunction Against Eros Media

On Tuesday, 23rd June 2020, Bombay High Court said both petitions filed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali Productions seeking directions to restrain Eros International Media from selling or exploiting the rights of two films, Goliyon Ki Raasleela Ram Leela and Bajirao Mastani, will now be heard jointly on 30th June 2020.

Justice BP Colabawalla by video conferencing heard petitions filed pursuant to Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking immediate ad-interim reliefs banning Eros International Media, the parent company Eros International PLC and STX Film from the sale, use, transfer, licensing, distribution or renewal of Bajirao Mastani rights. Mr. Bhansali has directed and co-produced both the movies.

Senior Advocate ZalAdhyarujina appeared on behalf of the petitioner Bhansali Productions and submitted that on 18th April 2020, his clients found an Intimation filed with the Bombay Stock Exchange by Eros International Media Limited claiming that their ultimate parent firm, Eros International Plc and STX Filmworks, Inc. had entered into a definitive stock-for-stock merger agreement, according to which STX Entertainment will merge with a newly formed Eros International Plc subsidiary and survive such a merger as Eros International Plc 's indirect wholly-owned subsidiary.

The merger is entered on the misleading and incorrect disclosure that Eros International PLC has some rights to the film 'Bajirao Mastani.' In reality, neither Eros International PLC nor STX Filmworks, INC are parties to Bhansali Productions' co-production agreement with Eros International Media Limited, they cannot claim any rights in the film, Adhyarujina said.

Advocate Akshay Patil appeared in Eros International Media on behalf of the respondent. 

Last month, after Bhansali moved to court to seek the same interim relief restricting Eros International Media, the parent company Eros International PLC and STX Film from selling, exploiting, assigning, licensing, distributing, or renewing the film's "Goliyo Ki Raas Leela Ram Leela" rights. 

After hearing submissions of both parties, the Court had observed-

"Prima facie I find that an amount of Rs.19,39,241/- is payable by respondent No.1 to the petitioner. At this stage, I do not find that this money should be withheld by respondent No.1."

Justice Colabawalla had given the respondents three weeks of time to pay that amount. 

On Tuesday, 23rd June 2020, the Court adjourned the matter after hearing both parties' submissions and the next hearing date is 30th June 2020.

Sanjay Leela Bhansali's love story 'Goliyon Ki Rasleela: Ram-Leela', which was released earlier, had faced protests in Indore, Rajkot, Jalandhar and the capital regarding its title and content. 

Some members of an NGO held a protest in the capital outside a theatre over the Deepika Padukone-Ranveer Singh starrer film, demanding a change in its title. People raised slogans against the movie and the protests ended when police arrived on the scene and whisked away the demonstrators to the nearest police station.

Despite the film's title being changed, first from 'Ramleela' to 'Ram-Leela', and then to 'Goliyon Ki Rasleela: Ram-Leela', there is still controversy.

Mr.Bhansali later agreed to the demands of the community of Kshatriya in Rajkot by changing certain "provocative" words in his film. The words 'Jadeja' and 'Rabari' were changed to 'Sanedo' and 'Rajouri' according to demand from the community. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

appointing-poster-pasting-politicians-as-public-prosecutors-compromises-justice-madras-hc-slams-tamil-nadu-govt-over-merit-blind-law-officer-appointments
Trending Judiciary
“Appointing Poster-Pasting Politicians as Public Prosecutors Compromises Justice”: Madras HC Slams Tamil Nadu Govt Over Merit-Blind Law Officer Appointments [Read Order]

Madras HC slams Tamil Nadu over politically motivated law officer appointments, warns merit-blind selections compromise justice and harm litigants.

03 April, 2026 04:52 PM
trust-over-fear-parliament-passes-jan-vishwas-bill-2026-decriminalises-minor-offences-across-79-laws
Trending Executive
“Trust Over Fear”: Parliament Passes Jan Vishwas Bill, 2026, Decriminalises Minor Offences Across 79 Laws [Read Bill]

Parliament passes Jan Vishwas Bill 2026, decriminalising minor offences across 79 laws, easing compliance, reducing litigation, and boosting ease of doing business.

03 April, 2026 04:58 PM

TOP STORIES

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM
vedanta-approaches-sc-to-halt-adanis-jaypee-takeover-under-insolvency-plan
Trending Business
Vedanta Approaches SC to Halt Adani’s Jaypee Takeover Under Insolvency Plan

Jaypee takeover row reaches Supreme Court as Vedanta challenges Adani’s JAL resolution plan, citing higher bid and value maximisation issues.

30 March, 2026 06:02 PM
calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email