38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, February 19, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay High Court upset over non-utilization of CSR funds for covid relief by Vidarbha companies [READ ORDER]

By Pariyal Gupta      24 May, 2021 03:06 PM      0 Comments
Bombay High Court upset over non-utilization of CSR funds for covid relief by Vidarbha companies [READ ORDER]

The Bombay High Court has shown disappointment over the unsatisfactory response of the private companies in Vidarbha about the utilization of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) funds towards covid relief.

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court noted that the response received by the Court from different companies operating in the Vidarbha region was not encouraging enough. 

A suo moto hearing was initiated in the Bombay High Court to strengthen the health care system in the Vidarbha region to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic. The Court had appealed to private and public sector companies to utilize their CSR funds for the management of Covid-19 in that region.

A division bench comprising of Justice Sunil Shukre and Justice Avinash G. Gharote observed that While responses from the public sector companies like WCI/ CIL and MOIL has been so far extremely good, the same is not with the private sector companies.. 

During a previous hearing of this suo moto Public Interest Litigation (PIL), the bench had request amicus curiae Shreerang Bhandarkar and other Advocates including Sudhir Puranik, Bhanudas Kulkarni, Tushar Mandlekar, Nidhi Dayani, M.Anil Kumar, and others to inform about industrial units in the Vidarbha region whose Corporate Social Responsibility Fund could be utilized for Covid-19 management. 

The Court further observed that corporate entities are enjoined with a statutory duty under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, to discharge their corporate social responsibility. 

Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, provides that every company having a net worth of Rs.500 crores or more, or turnover of Rs.100 crores or more or a net profit of Rs.5 crores or more during any financial year is required to spend at least 2% of the average net profits (of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years) in pursuance of its CSR policy. It is required that for spending the earmarked CSR amount, the company should give preference to the local area and areas around which it operates. 

Regarding the companys corporate social responsibility, the court observed that It is expected that these companies discharge their duty when they are called upon to do so and in our opinion, there could have been no better opportunity than the present time and present cause to discharge the duty.

The Court stated that if these companies do not respond to the appeal made by this Court, it would have to issue necessary directions.

The Court directed the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, and the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati to collect information regarding the availability of CSR Funds with all companies operating within their respective divisions and to make a request for the release of CSR funds found to be available upon such verification. 

Besides this, the Court also addressed the Mucormycosis situation. Mucormycosis or black fungus has been increasing at an alarming rate. It had been brought to the notice of the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court that the drugs being used for the treatment of black fungus disease are exceptionally pricey. The Court requested the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority and Central Drug Controller to issue necessary directions regarding production, increase in production, and distribution of the drugs used for the treatment of Mucormycosis.

Further, the Court suggested the Division Commissioners of Nagpur and Amravati immediately start an awareness campaign to acquaint the public about the cause, effect, and preventive measures to be taken to tackle the black fungus disease or Mucormycosis.

The matter will be considered next on May 27, 2021.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

madras-hc-directs-ms-dhoni-to-pay-10-lakh-for-transcription-of-cds-in-defamation-suit
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Directs MS Dhoni to Pay ₹10 Lakh for Transcription of CDs in Defamation Suit [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs MS Dhoni to pay ₹10 lakh for transcription and translation of CDs in his defamation suit against Zee Media.

13 February, 2026 02:36 PM
sc-holds-successive-fir-registration-to-keep-accused-in-custody-is-abuse-of-process-grants-bail-under-article-32
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Successive FIR Registration to Keep Accused in Custody Is Abuse of Process; Grants Bail Under Article 32 [Read Order]

Supreme Court calls successive FIRs to keep accused in custody an abuse of process, grants bail under Article 32 in Jharkhand case.

13 February, 2026 02:48 PM
sc-holds-post-arbitral-award-transferee-cannot-resist-execution-reaffirms-lis-pendens-doctrine-applies-to-money-decrees
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Post-Arbitral Award Transferee Cannot Resist Execution; Reaffirms Lis Pendens Doctrine Applies to Money Decrees [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules post-arbitral award purchasers can’t block execution; lis pendens applies to money decrees under Transfer of Property Act.

13 February, 2026 02:59 PM
sc-holds-anticipatory-bail-has-no-time-limit-protection-continues-after-chargesheet
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Anticipatory Bail Has No Time Limit, Protection Continues After Chargesheet [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules anticipatory bail has no time limit, continues after chargesheet, and High Courts can’t restrict protection to investigation stage.

13 February, 2026 03:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email