38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

You Will Not Decide What One Wants To Watch: Bombay High Court To CBFC

By LawStreet News Network      08 July, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments

The Bombay High Court rapped the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) on July 5, 2019, while hearing a petition filed by the Childrens Film Society (CFS), India, seeking directions to the CBFC tribunal to hear its plea to issue universal certificate to its film Chidiakhana.

A Division Bench of Justices S.C. Dharmadhikari and Gautam Patel has strongly rebuked the board when it was informed that the censor board had refused to issue a universal (U) certificate to a childrens film.

In January, the board asked CFS to mute a word from a scene in the movie and also delete a particular scene from the film. The society agreed to make the said changes in June and the court asked CBFC for a response thereafter, to which the CBFC submitted that the film showed violence and discrimination against a community, hence the content mandates a U/A certificate.

A U/A certificate requires adult supervision of kids below the age of 12 in order to be able to watch the film.

Hearing the petition, the Bench said the CBFC, by asking for such scenes to be deleted in films, was pretending that these issues do not exist.

Are you (CBFC) ostriches? Put your head in the sand and pretend something does not exist, Justice Patel said.

The CBFC submitted before the court that it has laid down certain conditions and if those are fulfilled then the film will be given U/A certificate.

Irked with this, the court asked how can the board say that it will give U/A certificate irrespective of whether the scene and abusive word is deleted.

We actually wonder if the CBFC officials have children of their own. You (CBFC) are a certification board and not a censor board. You will not decide what one wants to watch and see, Justice Patel said.

Nobody has given you (CBFC) the intellectual morality and authority to decide what one wants to watch and see, he added.

Further, the Bench said that the world was changing and so was the art of storytelling.

Looks like we may have to redefine your (CBFC) role entirely. You (CBFC) are forming an opinion that the whole population is infantile and imbecile and you are the only one with an iota of intelligence to decide for everyone, Justice Patel said.

The court observed when a childrens film shows or speaks about issues like racism, discrimination, child labour and drug abuse, then it is better to use the films to explain these issues to children.

How else does one show and explain these issues to a child? Is it not better to show such films to the child and explain that this is what happens and this is wrong, Justice Patel said.

The Bench asked the CBFCs Regional Officer to file an affidavit elaborating and outlining the boards policy while certifying childrens films.

It has posted the petition for further hearing on August 5, 2019.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

those-who-dont-believe-in-gurus-are-rascals-madras-hc-judge-sparks-row
Trending Judiciary
“Those Who Don’t Believe in Gurus Are Rascals”: Madras HC Judge Sparks Row

Madras HC Justice G.R. Swaminathan’s remarks on non-believers spark nationwide debate as impeachment motion and judicial conduct concerns resurface.

24 February, 2026 11:49 AM
ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email