38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Bombay High Court drops Culpable Homicide charges against Pillion Rider

By LawStreet News Network      23 January, 2020 03:01 PM      0 Comments
Bombay High Court drops Culpable Homicide charges against Pillion Rider

The Bombay High Court on January 21, 2020 dropped the charges against pillion rider Justin Lawrence accused of riding triple seat on bike and causing death of a Senior citizen Tina Edward Misquita. Justice AM Badar said that none of the witnesses statements revealed that pillion rider Justin Lawrence had any common intention with the rider of the motorcycle to be charged with culpable homicide not amounting to murder. He also added that Charge for the offence punishable under Section 304 read with Section 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code framed against the applicant/accused No.2 Justin John Lawrence is quashed and set aside.

Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the application by contending that the sessions court had rightly charged the man with Section 304 (II).

Section 304 of IPC says that

Whoever commits culpable homicide not amounting to murder shall be punished with 1[imprisonment for life], or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death, or of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, or with fine, or with both, if the act is done with the knowledge that it is likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death, or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death.

And Section 34 of IPC says that,

When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.

According to section 304 of IPC, there should be an intention of causing death or causing bodily injury that could cause death and section 34 says that there should a common intention among the people accused of an offence. This element was lacking in the present case, hence Mr. Lawrence cannot be charged with culpable homicide amounting to murder.

The offence was caused in 2012 when accused John Alexander Fernandez who was driving the bike along with Lawrence and one other person, caused fatal injuries to 65 years old Tina Edward Misquita.

The Bombay High Court held that for want of evidence, the case against Laurence shall be dismissed. 

Author Aditi Dubey



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM

TOP STORIES

sheikh-hasina-blames-yunus-led-interim-government-for-deteriorating-india-bangladesh-relations
Trending International
Sheikh Hasina Blames Yunus-Led Interim Government for Deteriorating India-Bangladesh Relations

Sheikh Hasina blames the Yunus-led interim government for straining India-Bangladesh ties, citing hostile rhetoric and failure to protect minorities.

23 December, 2025 12:08 AM
bhagavad-gita-not-a-religious-text-fcra-registration-cannot-be-denied-for-teaching-gita-and-yoga-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Bhagavad Gita Not a Religious Text; FCRA Registration Cannot Be Denied for Teaching Gita and Yoga: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules Bhagavad Gita is not a religious text; FCRA registration cannot be denied to organisations teaching Gita and Yoga.

24 December, 2025 05:35 PM
two-distinct-reliefs-cannot-be-intermingled-in-a-single-writ-petition-sc
Trending Judiciary
Two Distinct Reliefs Cannot Be Intermingled in a Single Writ Petition: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that distinct reliefs cannot be combined in one writ petition, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh plea limited to one relief.

24 December, 2025 05:45 PM
income-from-sale-of-tissue-cultured-plants-constitutes-agricultural-income-exempt-from-tax-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Income from Sale of Tissue-Cultured Plants Constitutes Agricultural Income, Exempt from Tax: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules income from sale of tissue-cultured plants is agricultural income exempt from tax under the Income Tax Act.

24 December, 2025 06:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email