38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, June 29, 2024
Judiciary

BSF officer dismissed for threatening his senior he would 'shoot him', Delhi HC upholds dismissal [Read Judgment]

By Shreya Agarwal      17 January, 2024 11:30 AM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has upheld the dismissal of service of an ex-Border Security Force (BSF) officer who was terminated for telling his superior officer that “he will shoot him”.

The Court was hearing the plea of one Brijesh Kumar Singh challenging an order of the Summary Security Force Court (SSFC) dismissing the petitioner from service as well as sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months in a civil prison.

Dismissing the plea, the Court held, “Suffice to state, insofar as the first charge is concerned, the imputations are that the petitioner has used threatening language to his superior officer that “he would shoot him”. Similarly, the imputation qua second charge is that he has used insubordinate language to a constable of the same company and thrashed him on his face. So, as reiterated above, the charges which have been proved against the petitioner are very serious.”

The Court also noted that the penalty of dismissal which was also accompanied by the penalty of rigorous imprisonment for a period of 6 months in a civil prison, was already mitigated in the statutory plea preferred by Singh.

The SSFC had found Singh guilty of charges imposed under Sections 20(b) [using threatening language to superior officer] , 20(c) [using insubordinate language to senior officer], and 40 [an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of the force] of the BSF Act.

Adv. S. N. Shukla appearing for Singh argued that dismissal from service  is disproportionate to the charges leveled against him and the findings of the SSFC, the Court was not inclined to interfere with the same.

However, the bench of Justices V Kameswar Rao and Saurabh Banerjee held, “When the petitioner was employed in a disciplined force, this Court is of the view that the penalty of dismissal from service, should not be interfered with.”

Cause Title: Brijesh Kumar Singh v Union of India & Ors.

 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid’ where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS


Warning: foreach() argument must be of type array|object, bool given in /home/lawstreet/public_html/trending-top-stories-sidebar.php on line 8

TOP STORIES

kejriwal-moves-sc-against-delhi-hc-order-blocking-his-release-in-liquor-policy-case-plea-seeking-urgent-hearing-likely-to-be-mentioned-today
Trending Judiciary
Kejriwal moves SC against Delhi HC order blocking his release in Liquor Policy case; plea seeking urgent hearing likely to be mentioned today

Kejriwal moves SC against Delhi HC order halting his bail in liquor policy case; urgent hearing plea likely to be mentioned today.

24 June, 2024 10:47 AM
uapa-tribunal-confirms-ban-upon-two-jk-outfits
Trending Executive
UAPA Tribunal confirms ban upon two J&K outfits

UAPA Tribunal confirms ban on ‘Muslim League J&K’ and ‘Tehreek-e-Hurriyat J&K’ for secessionist activities under Section 3(1) of the anti-terror law.

24 June, 2024 11:10 AM
public-examination-prevention-of-unfair-means-act-notified-amid-paper-leakage-charges
Trending Know The Law
Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act notified, amid paper leakage charges [Read Notice]

Union govt. notifies the Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, imposing strict penalties for paper leaks, effective from June 21, 2024.

24 June, 2024 11:55 AM
supreme-court-to-hear-arvind-kejriwals-plea-on-delhi-excise-policy-bail-stay-on-june
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court to Hear Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea on Delhi Excise Policy Bail Stay on June 26

Supreme Court to hear Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s plea on June 26, challenging Delhi High Court’s stay on his bail in the Delhi excise policy case.

24 June, 2024 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email