38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

BULLI BAI CASE: Mumbai Sessions Court Grants Bail To All Six Accused

By Shashwata Sahu      22 June, 2022 11:15 AM      0 Comments
BULLI BAI CASE Mumbai Sessions Court Grants Bail To All Six Accused

On Tuesday, the Mumbai Sessions Court granted bail to three accused in the BulliBai Case - Aumkareshwar Thakur, Neeraj Bishnoi, and Neeraj Singh.

Earlier this year, the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate granted bail to three of the accused and denied release to Thakur and Singh, while Bishnoi had to withdraw his application on technical grounds. With the Sessions Court's bail order issued on Tuesday, all six accused in the case have been granted bail.

On Tuesday, the additional sessions judge AB Sharma ordered that the accused be released on bail on furnishing a Rs.50,000 bail bond with one or two solvent sureties of the same amount. The accused were also ordered to visit the cyber police station once a month and were prohibited from travelling abroad without the court's prior permission.

In their bail application filed through Advocate Shivam Deshmukh, the accused cited the following grounds:

  1. That they have been falsely implicated and have not committed the offences as alleged;
  2. That they hail from a respectable family and the act alleged is beyond imagination;
  3. That a Delhi court has already granted them bail for similar offences;
  4. That they are in no position to hamper the investigation in light of all electronic devices purportedly used for the crime having been seized;
  5. That the offences under Sections 153(a) and 153(b) of the Indian Penal Code cannot be attracted as only one religion was targeted and there was to enticement of disharmony between two religions;
  6. That they're not the creators of the app;
  7. That the co-accused have already been released on bail;
  8. The role of the applicants is of only following the app, which does not constitute any offence, as alleged;
  9. That even if the allegations are true, the court should take a "fatherly view" as the applicants require counselling and not incarceration;
  10. That since the punishment for the offences is less than three years, incarceration is unwarranted and will result in pre-judicial sentences;
  11. That they will not tamper with evidence.

The special prosecutor vigorously opposed all applications. He contended that a prima facie case had been established against them and that the evidence gathered thus far clearly demonstrated the accused's role. He went on to say that the accused's activities were detrimental to the nation's harmony and threatened its integrity. Therefore, he prayed for the application to be rejected.

The case began with the appearance of the app "Bulli Bai" on the open-source platform GitHub. The application provided information on more than one hundred prominent Muslim women and allowed users to participate in a virtual "auction" for these women.

On January 1, 2022, the cyber cell of the Mumbai police filed a First Information Report (FIR) in response to complaints from women who had been targeted by the app. The Delhi Police had also filed a separate FIR in relation to the offence.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

arbitration-agreement-valid-without-signatures-if-consensus-evident-from-conduct-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Arbitration Agreement Valid Without Signatures if Consensus Evident from Conduct: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Arbitration agreement valid even without signatures if parties’ conduct shows intent to arbitrate, rules Kerala High Court in Sigmatic Nidhi Ltd v. Suresh Kumar.

12 November, 2025 11:29 AM
madras-hc-refers-questions-of-caste-certificate-verification-after-retirement-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Refers Questions Of Caste Certificate Verification After Retirement To Larger Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court refers issue of caste certificate verification after retirement to larger bench amid conflicting rulings on post-retirement inquiries.

12 November, 2025 11:39 AM

TOP STORIES

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM
magistrates-power-to-order-probe-under-section-156-3-crpc-cannot-be-invalidated-for-mere-technical-errors-sc
Trending Judiciary
Magistrate’s Power to Order Probe Under Section 156(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invalidated for Mere Technical Errors: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a Magistrate’s order under Section 156(3) CrPC cannot be nullified for minor technical or linguistic errors if offences are made out.

07 November, 2025 05:05 PM
physiotherapists-and-occupational-therapists-cannot-use-dr-prefix-without-medical-qualification-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Physiotherapists And Occupational Therapists Cannot Use ‘Dr’ Prefix Without Medical Qualification: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court restrains physiotherapists and occupational therapists from using ‘Dr.’ prefix without recognized medical qualification.

07 November, 2025 05:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email