38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

CAA Controversy: For The First Time In History A State (Kerala) Moves The Supreme Court Against A Legislation (CAA) Of The Central Government

By Lawstreet Bharat      14 January, 2020 12:01 PM      0 Comments
CAA Controversy: For The First Time In History A State (Kerala) Moves The Supreme Court Against A Legislation (CAA) Of The Central Government

The Government of Kerala had demanded the cancellation of the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. The state government reached the Supreme Court today (January 14, 2020) challenging the constitutionality of CAA. This is the first time that the government of any state has reached the Supreme Court against the CAA. 

In a petition, the Kerala government has demanded the scrapping of the CAA being violative of the Constitution of India, 1949. It is written in the petition that this law, which violates fundamental rights, is discriminatory. This law, which violates Articles 14, 21 and 25 of the Constitution, is against the very idea of secularism.

On January 22, 2020 the Supreme Court will hear all the petitions that have been filed against the Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019. Their number is around 60. The Supreme Court had issued a notice to the government and sought its response. If there is any difference between the Central Government of India and the State Governments, the State can file a petition under Article 131 of the Constitution. 

In the three major regional newspapers of Kerala, on the first page of the newspaper of the month, 10 advertisements were printed in which it was clearly written that the Kerala Assembly is the Legislative Assembly that will pass a resolution against the implementation of the CAA. There was talk of stopping the National Population Register or NPR and National Register of Citizens or NRC as well. This move was vehemently was opposed by Kerala Governor, Arif Mohammad Khan.

 

Author: Lawstreet Journal Editor, Kshipra Srivastava



Share this article:

About:
Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email