38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, January 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Can husband be prosecuted under Section 377 IPC for non-consensual anal sex with wife when Section 375 exempts it? Delhi High Court to examine

By Vaibhav Gattani      05 March, 2022 12:15 AM      1 Comments
Can husband be prosecuted Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has delinked from a batch of pleas seeking criminalisation of marital rape. The plea Abdulla Khan v. Union of India and Others is seeking to declare that a husband cannot be prosecuted for the offence of unnatural sex with his wife under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, when exception 2 to Section 375 gives exception to marital sex from the offence of rape.

A division bench comprising of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice C Hari Shankar has reserved its judgment in the bunch of pleas challenging the exception to Section 375 of the Code, after marathon hearing continuing for days.

Delinking the petition from the said batch of petitions, the Court said that it will be hearing the matter separately while listing it on March 112022.

"Since the issue raised in the above-captioned petition is qualitatively different from the bunch of the writ petitions in which hearing has been held before us i.e., W.P.(C) Nos. 284/2015, 5858/2017, 6024/2017 and W.P.(Crl.) No.964/2017, it is ordered to be delinked from the batch. The instant writ petition will be heard separately," the Court ordered.

The petition filed by Advocate Amit Kumar raises the question as to whether the 2013 amendment to Section 375 is inconsistent with Section 377 qua the legally wedded citizens. After 2013 amendment, the scope of the offence of rape has been expanded to cover penetrative acts other than penile-vaginal. So when exception 2 to Section 375 excludes marital sex from the offence of rape, it is anomalous to prosecute a husband for non-vaginal penetrative sexual acts under Section 377 IPC, the petitioner argues.

The petitioner is facing prosecution for the offence of Section 377 IPC for alleged non-consensual anal sex with his wife. When the same act is exempted under Section 375 IPC, the prosecution under Section 377 IPC is unsustainable, argues the petitioner.

Arguing that after amendment in Section 375, the penal law of the country has become uncertain, the petition seeks a declaration that it is unconstitutional to prosecute the man for the "unnatural" sexual relations with his wife.



Share this article:



John Doe
Norman Albuquerque Mar 08, 2022

if husband have sex with wife it would not constitute an offence under section 377ipc or for that matter any married couple But it is an offence if the women is not your wife

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM
pre-deposit-under-sarfaesi-act-must-be-made-before-drat-not-before-bank-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Pre-deposit Under SARFAESI Act Must Be Made Before DRAT, Not Before Bank: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC holds SARFAESI pre-deposit must be made before DRAT, not the bank, and writ petitions are not maintainable when a statutory appellate remedy exists.

09 January, 2026 07:08 PM
auction-authority-cannot-cancel-highest-bid-to-seek-better-price-in-fresh-auction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Auction Authority Cannot Cancel Highest Bid to Seek Better Price in Fresh Auction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules auction authorities cannot cancel a valid highest bid merely to seek higher prices in a fresh auction, calling such action arbitrary and illegal.

09 January, 2026 07:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email