38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Can husband be prosecuted under Section 377 IPC for non-consensual anal sex with wife when Section 375 exempts it? Delhi High Court to examine

By Vaibhav Gattani      05 March, 2022 12:15 AM      1 Comments
Can husband be prosecuted Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has delinked from a batch of pleas seeking criminalisation of marital rape. The plea Abdulla Khan v. Union of India and Others is seeking to declare that a husband cannot be prosecuted for the offence of unnatural sex with his wife under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, when exception 2 to Section 375 gives exception to marital sex from the offence of rape.

A division bench comprising of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice C Hari Shankar has reserved its judgment in the bunch of pleas challenging the exception to Section 375 of the Code, after marathon hearing continuing for days.

Delinking the petition from the said batch of petitions, the Court said that it will be hearing the matter separately while listing it on March 112022.

"Since the issue raised in the above-captioned petition is qualitatively different from the bunch of the writ petitions in which hearing has been held before us i.e., W.P.(C) Nos. 284/2015, 5858/2017, 6024/2017 and W.P.(Crl.) No.964/2017, it is ordered to be delinked from the batch. The instant writ petition will be heard separately," the Court ordered.

The petition filed by Advocate Amit Kumar raises the question as to whether the 2013 amendment to Section 375 is inconsistent with Section 377 qua the legally wedded citizens. After 2013 amendment, the scope of the offence of rape has been expanded to cover penetrative acts other than penile-vaginal. So when exception 2 to Section 375 excludes marital sex from the offence of rape, it is anomalous to prosecute a husband for non-vaginal penetrative sexual acts under Section 377 IPC, the petitioner argues.

The petitioner is facing prosecution for the offence of Section 377 IPC for alleged non-consensual anal sex with his wife. When the same act is exempted under Section 375 IPC, the prosecution under Section 377 IPC is unsustainable, argues the petitioner.

Arguing that after amendment in Section 375, the penal law of the country has become uncertain, the petition seeks a declaration that it is unconstitutional to prosecute the man for the "unnatural" sexual relations with his wife.



Share this article:



John Doe
Norman Albuquerque Mar 08, 2022

if husband have sex with wife it would not constitute an offence under section 377ipc or for that matter any married couple But it is an offence if the women is not your wife

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-gives-split-verdict-on-juvenile-anticipatory-bail-refers-issue-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Gives Split Verdict on Juvenile Anticipatory Bail, Refers Issue to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court delivers split verdict on juveniles seeking anticipatory bail; majority bars pre-arrest relief, strong dissent prompts larger Bench review.

22 November, 2025 12:54 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM
findings-based-on-assumptions-cannot-replace-evidence-sc-upholds-auction-sale-in-revenue-recovery-dispute
Trending Judiciary
“Findings Based on Assumptions Cannot Replace Evidence”: SC Upholds Auction Sale in Revenue Recovery Dispute [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds a 2005 revenue recovery auction, ruling that statutory remedies not invoked on time cannot be bypassed through writ jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 11:24 AM
delhi-hc-dismisses-ed-appeals-upholds-unfreezing-of-accounts-in-pmla-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Dismisses ED Appeals, Upholds Unfreezing of Accounts in PMLA Case [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds unfreezing of Poonam Malik’s bank accounts, ruling ED’s freezing orders were based on mere suspicion and violated mandatory PMLA safeguards.

17 November, 2025 11:43 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email