38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Can Registrars Of Births And Death compel DNA test before issuing birth certificates? Kerala HC answers [Read Judgment]

By Rintu Mariam Biju      15 February, 2024 08:23 PM      0 Comments
Can Registrars Of Births And Death Compel DNA test before issuing birth certificates Kerala HC answers

KOCHI: In a significant ruling, the Kerala High Court has held that the power of the Registrars of Births and Death to call for information before issuing a birth certificate does not authorise them to compel the conduct of DNA test. 

Of course, Section 21 (The Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969) confers the Registrar with the power to require any person to furnish any information within his knowledge in connection with the birth or death in the locality where that person is residing. This power to call for information does not authorise the Registrar to conduct a roving enquiry through police or to compel the child and the parents to undergo a DNA test, Justice VG Arun held. 

The Court was hearing a plea seeking to direct the authorities to issue birth certificate of the child of the petitioners. The plea challenged the Registrars decision ordering the conduct of DNA test for proving the parentage of the petitioner's child. 

While furnishing of false information is an offence punishable under Section 23(1)(b) of the Act, as per Section 23(2), the Registrar can be punished for neglect or refusal to register any birth or death occurring within his jurisdiction, without reasonable cause, the Court reiterated. 

Further, the Court said that the Registrar cannot delay issuing a birth certificate without reasonable cause. And, that theres a difference between reasonable cause and mere suspicion. 

A conjoint reading of the above provisions would show that the Registrar cannot delay the issuance of the birth certificate without reasonable cause. Mere suspicion, as is discernible from communication, is not the same as the reasonable cause mentioned in 23(2) of the Act.

In the judgement, the court also went through the objective as well as relevant provisions of the Act. 

The Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 ('the Act' for short) was enacted with the objective of implementing a sound and unified system for registration of births and deaths in the country. As per section 7 of the Act, Registrars have been appointed for every local area within the jurisdiction of a Municipality, Panchayat or other local authority. The third respondent is one such Registrar appointed. Sub section (2) of Section 7 requires the Registrar to enter in the register maintained for the purpose, all information given to him under Section 8 or Section 9 of the Act. Once the process of registration is completed, Section 12 makes it mandatory for the Registrar to issue an extract of the prescribed particulars relating to the birth or death to the person who gives the information under Section 8 or Section 9 of the Act.

While allowing the plea, the Court directed the Registrar to process the application submitted by the first petitioner and take a decision within two weeks. 
The petitioner was represented by advocates PA Mujeeb, Reshma R, Nezrin T Ibrahim, Sreelakshmi P, Salwa T Muhammed, TA Athira and Muhammad Hashir M.
The State authorities were represented by Government Pleader Bimal K Nath.

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Rintu Mariam Biju graduated from the National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi after comp...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Only a Woman Knows How Difficult it is to Balance Motherhood and Career' : Kerala High Court Reinstates Woman Fired for Availing Maternity Leave 'Only a Woman Knows How Difficult it is to Balance Motherhood and Career' : Kerala High Court Reinstates Woman Fired for Availing Maternity Leave

"The mother's constant proximity to the child has been scientifically proven to be absolutely irreplaceable, which is why, among other things, maternity leave provisions are now internationally accepted," it further added. Kerala high court, Kerala high court order, Kerala high court judgement, Kerala high court chief justice, Motherhood and Career

Kerala HC Quashes 498A Dowry Harassment Case Against Live-In Partner, Citing Lack of Relative Status [Read Order] Kerala HC Quashes 498A Dowry Harassment Case Against Live-In Partner, Citing Lack of Relative Status [Read Order]

Read about a recent judgment by the Kerala High Court that quashed a dowry harassment case against a woman in a live-in relationship. The court ruled that she couldn't be considered a relative under Section 498A of the IPC, highlighting the importance of precise legal definitions.

Watching porn on mobile: Kerala HC highlights importance of mother cooked meals, outdoor sports [Read Order] Watching porn on mobile: Kerala HC highlights importance of mother cooked meals, outdoor sports [Read Order]

Kerala High Court emphasizes the importance of outdoor sports, home-cooked meals, and parental supervision, discouraging the gifting of mobile phones to minors. Learn why the court quashed a case related to private porn viewing and the need for responsible parenting.

Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal Disqualified from Lok Sabha After Conviction Suspension Plea Rejected by Kerala High Court [Read Notice] Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal Disqualified from Lok Sabha After Conviction Suspension Plea Rejected by Kerala High Court [Read Notice]

Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal PP faces disqualification from Lok Sabha as Kerala High Court rejects plea to suspend his conviction in an attempt to murder case. Get the latest updates on his legal battle.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email