38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, July 15, 2024
Judiciary

‘Cannot permit to give a purely contractual dispute the colour of a public function’ : Twitter to Delhi High Court in writ petition filed by Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde for restoration of Twitter account

By Aishwarya Gairola      09 July, 2021 06:57 PM      0 Comments
‘Cannot permit to give a purely contractual dispute the colour of a public function’ : Twitter to Delhi High Court in  writ petition filed by Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde for restoration of Twitter account

Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Delhi High Court seeking the restoration of his suspended Twitter account, invoking the High Court’s writ jurisdiction on the grounds that twitter imparts a public function and the nature of activities undertaken by Twitter is in furtherance of a Fundamental Right under Article 19(1)(a).

Twitter had blocked Hegde’s account in October 2019, for posting picture of August Landmasser, which was later unblocked and restored following a massive virtual uproar, Hegde’s account was again blocked by Twitter for sharing a poem titled,’ Hang Him’ which he had retweeted and was initially posted by Kavita Krishnan. Consequent to this, Hegde moved Delhi High Court contending that the said post did not violate any norms of Twitter’s posting norms.

Twitter, in its submissions before the Delhi High Court, claims that Twitter, through its platform is not discharging a public function and is therefore not mandated to comply with the writ jurisdiction in India under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Citing the observation made by the Supreme Court in Andi Mukta Sadguru v. V Rudani, (1989) 2 SCC 691 about the classification of ‘public duty’, the tech giant submitted that for an activity to be classified as a ‘public duty’, it is necessary that a positive obligation is cast to discharge that duty.

It further submitted that the services are subject to certain contractual terms and when operation of law is attracted by reason of a contract which a person is free to enter into, Article 19 has no application and pointed out that in the case of Jatya Pal Singh v. Union of India, (2013) 6 SCC 452, the Supreme Court had rejected the argument that the right to impart and receive information being a species of the guarantee under Article 19(1)(a), private telecom service providers are discharging a public function.

The Top Court had observed that all telecom operators are providing commercial service for commercial considerations. It held, "in order for it to be held that the body is performing a public function, the appellant would have to prove that the body seeks to achieve some collective benefit for the public or a section of public and accepted by the public as having authority to do so."

Basing the argument to establish its Commercial agenda attracting reason from the observation made in the case of Jatya Pal Singh v. Union of India, Twitter submitted “Myriad activities of private non-State entities may touch upon fundamental rights, but the same is not a sufficient predicate to bring them under the writ jurisdiction of the High Courts."

Claiming no State protected monopoly as is the criteria laid down by the Supreme Court for determining the nature of an entity and overseas operation of Twitter owing no duty to facilitate free speech and expression in the territory of India, Twitter, stated that  “no matter from which prism the present is observed, the provision of services on Twitter is not in any manner a public function, which would render the Respondent No. 2 amenable to the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."

Twitter has further stated that Hegde can avail the mechanism provided under the Information Technology Act, 2000 for redressal of his grievances, but he cannot be permitted to give a purely contractual dispute the colour of a public function.

A similar lawsuit has been filed against Twitter by Former US President Donald Trump for suspension of his social accounts in January over public safety concerns in the wake of the Capitol riots.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cic-has-powers-to-set-up-benches-sc
Trending Judiciary
CIC has powers to set up benches: SC [Read Judgement]

The Supreme Court affirms CIC's authority to set up benches, emphasizing its autonomy for efficient case management under the RTI Act, overturning the 2010 Delhi HC order.

15 July, 2024 09:42 AM

TOP STORIES

journalist-soumya-vishwanathan-murder-case-sc-issues-notice-to-4-convicts-on-appeal-by-delhi-police
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Journalist Soumya Vishwanathan murder case: SC issues notice to 4 convicts on appeal by Delhi police

SC issues notice to 4 convicts in Soumya Vishwanathan murder case on Delhi police's appeal against their bail. Convicts had served over 14 years.

09 July, 2024 09:49 AM
why-indian-high-courts-still-have-old-names-despite-change-in-city-name
Trending Judiciary
Why Indian High Courts still have old names despite change in city name ? [Watch Video]

Know the reasons why Indian High Courts, like Bombay HC, Madras HC, and Calcutta HC, Allahabad HC still retain their old names despite the cities’ name changes. LawStreet Journal delves into the historical and legal context. Watch report !

09 July, 2024 09:56 AM
what-is-keir-starmer-stance-on-kashmir-issue
Trending International
What is Keir Starmer’s stance on Kashmir issue ? [Watch Video]

Under Keir Starmer, the UK's Labour Party shifts its stance on Article 370, focusing on strategic ties with India, moving from past criticisms to cooperation.

09 July, 2024 10:04 AM
ed-moves-sc-against-jharkhand-hc-order-of-bail-to-cm-hemant-soren
Trending Judiciary
ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC order of bail to CM Hemant Soren

ED moves SC against Jharkhand HC's bail order for CM Hemant Soren in a money laundering case linked to an alleged land scam.

09 July, 2024 12:14 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email