38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Case Against Bharti Airtel For Sending Obscene Texts To Customer Goes To Trial As Madras HC Denies Quashing Criminal Proceedings

By LawStreet News Network      06 February, 2020 10:02 PM      0 Comments
Case Against Bharti Airtel For Sending Obscene Texts To Customer Goes To Trial As Madras HC Denies Quashing Criminal Proceedings

Major Telecom Company Bharti Airtel has to face trial as the High Court of Madras on 5th February 2020 denied to quash the criminal proceeding which was initiated against the company because of obscene messages received by a customer. 

While dismissing the plea, Justice P Velmurugan also directed the chief judicial magistrate in Egmore to carry one the trial according to the law and complete it within four months.

A police complaint was lodged by advocate V S Suresh in 2011 against the company and its former chief executive officer Rajiv Rajgopalan as the company couldnt stop the obscene messages received by him even after various complaints. On the basis of this complaint, the cyber cell of Central Crime Branch (CCB) registered an FIR under Section 92, 292A (distribution of obscene contents) & 294 Indian Penal Code, 1860 & Sections 3, 4 & 6 of Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 & Sections 2, 3 & 6 of the Young Persons (Harmful Publications) Act, 1956.

After investigation, CCB prepared a chargesheet in 2013 after which the magistrate ordered summons to the accused. Then the company filed a petition asking to set aside the criminal proceeding.

While backing their petition, the companys counsel said that The Company is only a service provider and has no role in sending such messages as it has no occasion to see the messages transferred from one customer to another. He further added that The messages said to have been received by Suresh were also not obscene as defined under the Indian Penal Code & therefore, the petitioner has nothing to do with the messages received by Suresh.

While referring to the statement recorded by the police, the judge said that It shows prima facie evidence & also the advocate made a complaint before the petitioners, for which they haven't taken any action.

Whether the company is liable or not will be decided during trial and the court did not find any reason to interfere in the criminal proceeding.

 

Author- Aditi Dubey



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email