38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Chief Justice Chandrachud Dismisses Ex-CJI Gogoi's Remarks on Basic Structure Doctrine as 'Opinions, Not Binding Facts

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      08 August, 2023 10:19 PM      0 Comments
Chief Justice Chandrachud Dismisses Ex-CJI Gogoi's Remarks on Basic Structure Doctrine as 'Opinions, Not Binding Facts

NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud on Tuesday brushed aside senior advocate Kapil Sibal's bid to raise the remarks made by former CJI Ranjan Gogoi in Rajya Sabha on basic structure doctrine, saying once judges demit office, their views are just opinions, not binding facts.

During the debate of a Bill on control of bureaucrats in Delhi, Justice Gogoi, a nominated Rajya Sabha member, on Tuesday said the basic structure of the Constitution has a "debatable jurisprudential basis".

In Kesavananda Bharti case (1973), the Supreme Court's Constitution bench laid down basic structure doctrine which are beyond the amending power Parliament. Over the years, features like supremacy of the Constitution, unity and sovereignty of India, democratic and republican form of government, federal and secular character of the Constitution, separation of power,
individual freedom, rule of law, judicial review etc are considered as basic structure of the Constitution.

Sibal highlighted the statement by Justice Gogoi before a five-judge Constitution bench led by CJI Chandrachud.

He was arguing on validity of decision of dilution of Article 370 of the Constitution.

Sibal said, one of your esteemed colleagues has said that in fact, basic structure theory is also doubtful.

Sibal was appearing for National Conference leader Mohd Akbar Lone, one of the petitioners who has challenged the abrogation of Article 370.

In response, CJI Chandrachud said, "Mr Sibal, when you refer to a colleague, you have to refer to a sitting colleague".

"Once we cease to be judges, they (retired judges' views) are opinions, not binding facts, he said.

On this, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, for the Centre, referred to freedom of speech and expression and said that Parliament does not discuss what goes on during court proceedings.

Sibal said "of course, absolutely".

Former CJI Gogoi Monday said the doctrine is on very debatable jurisprudential basis, as in his maiden intervention, he attacked the invocation of the basic structure doctrine by the Opposition on the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2023.

Justice Gogoi spoke in favour of the NCT Bill brought by the BJP government to replace the Ordinance meant to outwit the apex court verdict.

The Basic Structure is construed as the essential features of the Constitution which the Parliament cannot alter.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email