38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, December 18, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

CJI Bobde questions lawyer for being inappropriately dressed during Virtual Proceedings, asks Are you at a dinner party?

By Prachi Misra      14 July, 2020 01:56 PM      0 Comments
CJI Bobde questions lawyer for being inappropriately dressed during Virtual Proceedings, asks Are you at a dinner party?

On Friday 10th July 2020 Chief Justice of India (CJI) SA Bobde pulled up an advocate who was wearing a blue chequered tie instead of the lawyers band during the virtual court proceedings. 

Seeing his attire CJI asked What kind of a tie you are wearing? Are you at a dinner party?

The lawyer apologized and said Sorry my Lord... I wont appear like this in the future.

Justice Bobde further directed him to not appear like this before any court.

There have been many instances like this since virtual courts have started. In a similar incident, a lawyer was wearing a banyan or a casual tee during the virtual hearing, to which the court had stated, Even for video conferencing decorum of the court is required to be maintained. 

In May 2020, the SC came out with a formal notification of exempting lawyers from wearing coats and long gowns during the hearing through video conferencing till medical exigencies exist or until further orders in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic.

The notification came out after CJI Bobde said such dresses should not be donned as they make it easier to catch the virus.

Later in June 2020, the apex court further noted that the minimum court etiquette should be maintained during virtual court after a lawyer appeared in a T-Shirt while lying on the bed during a hearing.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM
property-tax-appeal-only-tax-amount-payable-penal-interest-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Property Tax Appeal: Only Tax Amount Payable, Penal Interest Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that municipalities cannot insist on penal interest for entertaining tax appeals; only the tax amount under Section 509(11) is required.

13 December, 2025 07:09 PM
sc-expands-ambit-of-posh-act-restrictive-interpretation-would-undermine-remedial-intent
Trending Judiciary
SC Expands Ambit of POSH Act: “Restrictive Interpretation Would Undermine Remedial Intent” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules ICC at aggrieved woman’s workplace has jurisdiction under POSH Act, rejecting restrictive interpretation and reinforcing women’s right to safety.

13 December, 2025 07:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email