38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

SC Tells Centre To Suggest Name By Feb 10 For Appointing EDs Special Public Prosecutor In Coal Scam Case

By LawStreet News Network      08 February, 2020 12:02 AM      0 Comments
SC Tells Centre To Suggest Name By Feb 10 For Appointing EDs Special Public Prosecutor In Coal Scam Case

On February 7, 2020, Supreme Court bench comprising CJI S.A. Bobde and Justice Deepak Gupta was considering a plea by Senior Advocate R S Cheema, who wanted to be relieved as the (Enforcement Directorate) EDs Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in money laundering cases. The Apex Court granted time to Central Government till February 10, 2020 to suggest the name of a lawyer to conduct trials for ED in money laundering cases related to the coal block scam.

Senior Advocate R S Cheema said that she can continue to be CBIs Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) in Coal Scam cases but she cannot continue to be EDs SPP due to shortage of law officers. 

Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre suggested many names including the name of former Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh to replace Cheema but the Court rejected these suggestions but said that lawyers names suggested by Cheema are more appropriate than Centres lawyers' names list.

"We need a trial court lawyer who has been conducting trials," the bench said, adding that "the other lawyer" suggested by Cheema seemed to be more appropriate.

Sources told PTI that Cheema has suggested the name of lawyer Satish Tamta for the job.

"The other name seems to be more appropriate," the bench said and gave the Centre time till February 10, 2020 to suggest names for this purpose.

The Apex Court told Solicitor General that court will not assemble for this purpose again. The court had on December 9, 2019 asked the Solicitor General and Cheema to give names of advocates who can be appointed the SPP for ED matters. 

 

Author Satwik Sharma



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email