38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Community Kitchen Case: Additional Cost Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Imposed On Five States

By LawStreet News Network      18 February, 2020 05:02 PM      0 Comments
Community Kitchen Case Additional Cost Imposed

The Supreme Court on February 17, 2020 imposed an additional cost of 5 lakhs on five states - Delhi, Maharashtra, Odisha, Goa and Manipur for failing to deposit 5 lakhs which were imposed earlier for not complying with the directions of the Supreme Court to file their affidavits on a PIL seeking setting up of community kitchens across the country.

A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana refused to entertain the plea of some State Governments to waive off this penalty.

As per the statement of Attorney General K.K Venugopal, another affidavit is going to be filed soon. The matter has been listed for further hearing on April 08, 2020.

It was observed that only seven states/UTs have filed affidavits, in connection with the food security and community kitchens which include Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Karnataka, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Jharkhand, Nagaland and Jammu & Kashmir.

The bench had then said that if State Governments file an affidavit within 24 hours, they will pay Rs. 1 lakh as cost and others who don't file a reply, will have to pay Rs. 5 lakhs.

A lot of children under the age of 5 are dying every day because of hunger and malnutrition. The plea alleged that this condition was violative of many fundamental rights, including the right to food and life of citizens.

The PIL sought a direction to the Centre for creating a national food grid for people falling outside the purview of the public distribution scheme.

The plea also stated that there are state-funded community kitchens being run in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Uttrakhand, Odisha, Jharkhand and Delhi. The meals are served at a subsidized rates and in hygienic conditions.

 

Author: Khushi Singh



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email