38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Company in moratorium under IBC; director can't be prosecuted for cheque dishonour: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      18 March, 2025 04:52 PM      0 Comments
Company in moratorium under IBC director cant be prosecuted for cheque dishonour SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said that if the company is in moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, its director cannot be prosecuted for dishonour of cheques.

SC Ruling: Directors Protected from Cheque Bounce Cases During IBC Moratorium

The court said such a director is suspended and he would not be able to make repayment.

A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Ahsanuddin Amanullah allowed an appeal filed by Vishnoo Mittal, director of M/s Xalta Food and Beverages Private Limited, the corporate debtor against the Punjab and Haryana High Courts order of December 21, 2021.

IBC Moratorium Shields Directors from Cheque Dishonour Liability: Supreme Court

The court set aside the High Court's order, which declined to quash the proceedings against him for the dishonour of cheques issued to complainant M/s Shakti Trading Company for the sum of over Rs 11 lakh.

In its judgment, the court pointed out return of the cheques dishonoured simpliciter does not create an offence under Section 138 NI Act and Clause (c) of the proviso makes it clear that cause of action arises only when demand notice is served and payment is not made within the stipulated 15-day period.

In the case, the court said that the High Court ought to have quashed the case against the appellant by exercising its power under Section 482 of the CrPC.

The High Court had relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in 'P Mohan Raj Vs M/S Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt Ltd' (2021) wherein it was held that the immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14 of the IBC can only be obtained by a corporate debtor and not by a natural person such as the present appellant, who was the director of the corporate debtor.

"However, in our opinion, the High Court erred in relying on P Mohan Raj since the facts of that case were completely different and the present case is thus distinguishable from it," the bench said.

The court noted in the present case, on July 25, 2018, the moratorium was imposed and management of the corporate debtor was taken over by the interim resolution professional (IRP) as per Section 17 of the IBC.

"The bare reading of the provision showed that the appellant did not have the capacity to fulfil the demand raised by the respondent by way of the notice issued under clause (c) of the proviso to Section 138 NI Act," the bench said.

The court further pointed out, when the notice was issued to the appellant, he was not in charge of the corporate debtor as he was suspended from his position as the director of the corporate debtor as soon as IRP was appointed on July 25, 2018.

"Therefore, the powers vested with the board of directors were to be exercised by the IRP in accordance with the provisions of IBC. All the bank accounts of the corporate debtor were operating under the instructions of the IRP, hence, it was not possible for the appellant to repay the amount in light of Section 17 of the IBC," the bench said.

With the imposition of the moratorium, the IRP had made a public announcement inviting the claims from the creditors of the corporate debtor and the respondent has filed a claim with the IRP, the court also noted.

The court quashed the summoning order and pending complaint case against the appellant before a Chandigarh court. 

[Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

delhi-itat-clears-37-cr-demonetization-cash-deposits-of-jeweller-dismisses-revenues-appeal
Trending Executive
Delhi ITAT Clears ₹3.7 Cr Demonetization Cash Deposits of Jeweller, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]

Delhi ITAT upholds jeweller’s ₹3.7 cr demonetization cash deposits, ruling them genuine sales; dismisses Revenue’s appeal under Sec 68.

05 September, 2025 11:45 AM
delhi-hc-grants-injunction-to-astrologer-trishla-chaturvedi-orders-removal-of-defamatory-videos-against-trishla-maa
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Injunction to Astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, Orders Removal of Defamatory Videos Against ‘Trishla Maa’ [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants injunction to astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, orders removal of defamatory videos and restrains further posts against her.

05 September, 2025 12:02 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-approves-ecs-move-to-accept-claims-or-objections-to-draft-electoral-rolls-beyond-sep-1
Trending Judiciary
SC approves EC's move to accept claims or objections to draft electoral rolls beyond Sep 1

SC allows EC to accept claims and objections to Bihar draft electoral rolls even after Sept 1 deadline, till last date of nominations.

01 September, 2025 02:54 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-pil-against-20-per-cent-ethanol-blended-petrol-e20-fuel
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain PIL against 20 per cent ethanol-blended petrol, E20 fuel

SC declines PIL against Centre’s E20 fuel rollout, upholding ethanol-blended petrol policy despite concerns on efficiency and vehicle damage.

01 September, 2025 03:01 PM
sc-notice-on-tns-plea-against-hcs-judgment-on-implementation-of-rte-act
Trending Judiciary
SC notice on TN's plea against HC's judgment on implementation of RTE Act

SC issues notice on Tamil Nadu plea against Madras HC order making state solely liable for RTE Act funding, seeks Centre’s response.

01 September, 2025 04:35 PM
sc-upholds-telanganas-4-year-residence-rule-to-avail-domicile-quota-in-medical-admissions
Trending Judiciary
SC upholds Telangana's 4-year residence rule to avail domicile quota in medical admissions [Read Judgment]

SC upholds Telangana’s rule requiring 4 years of study in the state for availing domicile quota in MBBS and BDS admissions.

01 September, 2025 06:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email