38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 29, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      21 October, 2024 01:36 PM      0 Comments
Complainant cant insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination SC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has said the complainant in a criminal case has no such mandatory right to insist that an application be decided in such a manner

Complainant Has No Right to Insist on Summoning Others Before Cross-Examination, Says SC

The complainant also can't insist that he would not subject himself to cross examination until his application for summoning other persons are decided by the trial court.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B Varale said, "The role of the complainant in a trial does not permit it to act as a public prosecutor on behalf of the State. The complainant and its counsel have a limited role in a sessions trial in a State case".

In a judgment on Friday, the bench also said the complicity of any person sought to be arrayed as an accused can be decided with or without conducting cross-examination of the complainant and other prosecution witnesses, and there is no mandate to decide the application under Section 319 CrPC before cross examination of other witnesses.

Trial Court’s Discretion Key in Deciding Applications Under Section 319 CrPC

Section 319 of the CrPC allows the trial court to summon a person as an accused at any stage of the trial.

Deciding an appeal filed by lone accused Asim Akhtar, the court set aside the Calcutta High Court's judgment which had reversed acquittal of the appellant in a case related to kidnapping for the purpose of marriage since the complainant had declined to appear for cross examination until her plea for summoning parents of the accused was decided.

The court upheld the order of acquittal and dismissal of application under Section 319 CrPC by the trial court.

Having relied upon the Constitution bench decision in Hardeep Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors (2014), the High Court has remanded the matter to the trial court with the direction to first decide the application under Section 319 CrPC and thereafter proceed with the sessions trial expeditiously.

"The 2014 judgment does not take away the discretion of the trial court to wait for the cross examination to take place before deciding the application under Section 319 CrPC. It merely provides that consideration of such an application should not be a mini trial," the bench explained.

The bench said it is for the trial court to decide whether the application should be decided without waiting for the cross examination to take place or to wait for it, which would depend upon the satisfaction of the trial court on the basis of the material placed on record.

The top court found the High Court failed to take into consideration the complainant had repeatedly declined to appear for the cross examination and kept on filing application for summoning parents of the accused in the case.

"Why the prosecution witnesses were shying from facing the cross-examination is not understood. Their only insistence was that the parents of the accused should be summoned and dragged into the trial and to somehow or the other keep the trial pending," the bench said.
 [Read Judgment]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

adult-woman-free-to-live-with-married-man-personal-autonomy-prevails-over-morality
Trending Judiciary
Adult Woman Free To Live With Married Man, Personal Autonomy Prevails Over Morality: Madhya Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Adult woman has right to live with married man, rules MP High Court; says personal autonomy outweighs moral concerns.

23 August, 2025 04:00 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-bci-on-plea-against-3-yr-moratorium-on-new-centre-for-legal-education
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to BCI on plea against 3-yr moratorium on new centre for legal education

SC issues notice to BCI on plea challenging 3-year moratorium on new legal education centres, calling it arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights.

23 August, 2025 05:13 PM
punjab-and-haryana-hc-upholds-denial-of-furlough-to-life-convict-rules-temporary-release-is-a-concession-not-a-right
Trending Judiciary
Punjab and Haryana HC Upholds Denial of Furlough to Life Convict, Rules Temporary Release Is A Concession, Not A Right [Read Order]

Punjab & Haryana HC upholds denial of furlough to life convict, rules temporary release is a concession, not a right, under 2022 law.

23 August, 2025 05:16 PM
sc-restores-mandatory-20-percent-deposit-for-suspension-of-sentence-in-cheque-bounce-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Restores Mandatory 20% Deposit for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Case [Read Order]

SC sets aside P&H HC order; rules 20% deposit mandatory for suspension of sentence in ₹8.65 crore cheque bounce case under NI Act.

25 August, 2025 12:35 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email