38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

DV Act: Complaint Not Maintainable If Parties Are Living Separately: SC [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      15 October, 2019 07:07 PM      0 Comments
DV Act: Complaint Not Maintainable If Parties Are Living Separately: SC [Read Order]

The Supreme Court on October 4, 2019, in the case of Kamlesh Devi v. Jaipal & Ors., has upheld a dismissal of domestic violence complaint filed by a woman against persons not living with her in a shared household.

A Division Bench comprising of Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice M.R. Shah passed the ruling while hearing a special leave petition filed against the order passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court whereby it had dismissed the criminal revision instituted by the petitioner under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Earlier, the Judicial Magistrate (First Class) dismissed the petitioners complaint filed under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, against her relatives. In the complaint, it was claimed that she is living with her relatives in the same premises and they are harassing and abusing her daughters.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the criminal revision observing that no evidence is in record to prove that they have been living in a shared household.

Taking note of the same, the apex court bench upheld the order passed by the High Court.

The High Court has rightly found in effect that the ingredients of domestic violence are wholly absent in this case. The petitioner and the respondents are not persons living together in a shared household. There is a vague allegation that the respondents are family members. There is not a whisper of the respondents with the petitioner. They appear to be neighbours, the bench observed.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email