38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 20, 2024
Judiciary

Concept of Creamy Layer cannot be applied to SC/ST: Centre to SC

By LawStreet News Network      17 August, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Concept of Creamy Layer cannot be applied to SC/ST: Centre to SC

On Thursday (August 16th, 2018), the Centre told the Supreme Court of India that "creamy layer" concept cannot be applied to the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe communities to deny them the benefits of quota in government promotions as they have suffered for centuries.

Appearing before a five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Attorney General K K Venugopal argued that there is no judgment which says that well-established people of the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) community can be denied quota benefits by applying creamy layer concept.

The top law officer said that even if some people of the community have come up, the mark of caste and backwardness is still attached to them, and the question of excluding a certain class of SC/ST has to be decided by the President and the Parliament and this exercise is not open to the judiciary.

The government wants a larger Bench of the Supreme Court to set aside its 12-year-old verdict in the case of M Nagaraj v. Union of India, as it is a roadblock to its authority to introduce quota in promotions in favour of SC/ST communities as per Article 16 (4A) of the Constitution of India.

Earlier, on July 11th, 2018 the apex court had refused to pass any interim order against the verdict and said that a five-judge Bench would first see whether it needs to be examined by a seven-judge Bench or not.

The M. Nagaraj verdict of 2006 mandates that the government cannot introduce quota in promotion for SC/ST persons in public employment unless they prove that the particular Dalit community is backward, is inadequately represented and such a reservation in promotion would not affect the overall efficiency of public administration.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

delhi-hc-orders-mcd-to-pay-10-lakh-compensation-in-minors-death-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC orders MCD to pay ₹10 Lakh compensation in minor's death case [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC directs MCD to pay ₹10 lakh for a minor's death due to negligence, applying res ipsa loquitur and affirming compensation for fundamental rights violations.

19 September, 2024 10:36 AM
sc-orders-release-of-convict-on-personal-bond-cites-injustice-in-denying-bail-due-to-inability-to-furnish-local-surety
Trending Judiciary
SC orders release of convict on Personal Bond, cites injustice in denying bail due to inability to furnish Local Surety [Read Order]

SC: Justice delivery mechanism must consider plight of indigent convicts unable to furnish local surety, orders release of convict on personal bond.

19 September, 2024 11:05 AM

TOP STORIES

rajasthan-hc-orders-10-year-passport-for-undertrial-in-matrimonial-dispute-cites-right-to-livelihood
Trending Judiciary
Rajasthan HC orders 10-year passport for undertrial in matrimonial dispute, cites right to livelihood [Read Order]

Rajasthan HC directs issuance of a 10-year passport to an undertrial in a matrimonial dispute, upholding the right to livelihood despite ongoing legal proceedings.

14 September, 2024 05:04 PM
himachal-pradesh-hc-clarifies-the-scope-of-section-482-crpc-in-compoundable-offences
Trending Judiciary
Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies the scope of Section 482 CrPC in compoundable offences [Read Order]

Himachal Pradesh HC clarifies that Section 482 CrPC cannot be invoked for compoundable offences when an alternative remedy under Section 320(1) is available.

14 September, 2024 05:36 PM
sc-bars-kejriwal-from-commenting-on-cbi-case-in-liquor-policy
Trending Judiciary
SC bars Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy

SC restrains Kejriwal from commenting on CBI case in liquor policy, grants bail with conditions, prohibiting visits to CM office and signing files.

16 September, 2024 10:33 AM
sc-rejects-plea-to-re-appear-in-neet-ug-for-not-being-allowed-to-carry-handkerchief
Trending Judiciary
SC rejects plea to re-appear in NEET UG for not being allowed to carry handkerchief [Read Judgment]

SC dismisses NEET UG candidate's plea to reappear due to a handkerchief ban, citing no significant impact on performance from hyperhidrosis during the exam.

16 September, 2024 10:37 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email