38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Consumer Court dismisses the case of SBI customer who lost Rs. 49,000 for entering wrong a/c number

By LawStreet News Network      22 June, 2018 12:00 AM      1 Comments

The Consumer Court has dismissed the case of a SBI customer who lost Rs. 49,500 because of entering one wrong number, stating that it is a human error. Whereas, the bank said he was not eligible for a refund as the complaint lacked specifics.

The error in question was committed by Mahindra Kumar Yamanappa when he deposited the amount purportedly into his savings account through a cash deposit machine (CDM) in Kalaburagi in north Karnataka on July 18, 2017.

When two days passed and no money was credited, Yamanappa approached his branch on SB Temple Road in Kalaburagi and lodged a complaint on the CDM complaint form on July 20th 2017. At that time he suspected that his account was hacked, but instead, the amount got transferred into the account of another SBI customer, Khan Shabab in Telangana who withdrawn the entire sum when he found an excess of Rs 49,500 in his account.

Responding to the complaint, the bank said that the money had gone to Shababs account as Yamanappa had mistakenly keyed in 8 instead of 0 on the CDM. Further, the bank claimed that they had written to the Adilabad branch on August 16 27 days after Yamanappas first complaint and asked their counterparts in Telangana to retrieve the cash.

But when the money was not credited, Yamanappa filed a complaint against SBI at the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in Kalaburagi on November 28 accusing SBI authorities of failing to act in time to block his money though he had lodged a complaint within 48 hours of the deposit.

SBIs counsel argued that the bank was not at fault since the customer had entered the wrong account number. Further, it was stated that Yamanappa, in his initial CDM complaint, failed to mention the erroneous account number and insisted that the money had been deposited to his account.

The court reprimanded Yamanappa for failing to mention the wrong account number and dismissed the case.

This is not the first time that the SBI customer had lost their hard earned money, earlier in another case the Consumer Court had dismissed a case of a woman who lost Rs. 25,000 when it was found out that her husband had tried to withdraw the money on her behalf from the ATM but the cash was not released. The court cited the rule that sharing ATM PIN with someone is violative.

Both these cases have raised a big question on who should be made punishable in case simple human errors are made by the SBI customers. The court while dismissing the case has not even provided any compensation to the aggrieved party, leaving them helpless when the court of justice itself failed to provide them justice.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


John Doe
Sanjit hembram Jan 22, 2021

No exit cash from atm . And debit my account 9000 cash

Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email