38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Contractual Employees Are Entitled To Maternity Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

By LawStreet News Network      03 January, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Contractual Employees Are Entitled To Maternity Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

The Kerala High Court in a recent case of Rasitha C.H. v. State of Kerala has held that a woman employee cannot be denied maternity benefits merely because her status is a contractual employee.

Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque was hearing a petition filed by 35-year old Rasitha, who was denied maternity leave by the Calicut University on the ground that the terms of her agreement did not envision the grant of such leave.

The petitioner had been working as an employee at the Calicut University for a decade on a contract basis. In August 2017, her contract was renewed for another year.

The learned counsel for the University submitted before the court that the petitioner, being a contract employee, can at best claim only 15 days casual leave during the period of one year and also permitted to abstain from duty on account of medical conditions of maternity.

However, rejecting the submission, the court held that The maternity benefit is not merely a statutory benefit or a benefit flowing out of an agreement.

The court took into consideration two cases of this court i.e., Mini v. Life Insurance Corporation of IndiaandRakhi PV and Others v. State of Kerala & Another wherein the court held that  women cannot be compelled to choose between motherhood and employment.

In Rakhis case (supra) this Court has specifically referred to the claim of maternity leave due to women employees who are working under contract and this court held that such women cannot be denied the maternity benefits. It is submitted in the Bar that the judgment in Rakhis case (supra) was affirmed by the Division Bench as well, the court observed.

Further, the court also observed that In Rakhis case (supra) it was held that a woman employee cannot be denied maternity benefits merely because her status is a contractual employee. Therefore, the University is bound to grant such benefits notwithstanding anything contained in the agreement of contract.

Thus, in view of the above observations, the court allowed Rasithas plea and directed the Calicut University to pay maternity benefits, as applicable in the case of other employees of the University, within two months.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email