38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Corona Virus: Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Central Government And Delhi Government; Next Date Of Hearing March 30, 2020

By LawStreet News Network      12 March, 2020 10:03 PM      0 Comments
Corona Virus Delhi HC Central Government Delhi Government

Delhi High Court issued notice to the Central Government and Delhi Government in order to gain information of all medical facilities and infrastructure to deal with the outbreak of Corona Virus. 

The decision was taken by the Division Bench which consisted of Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, D.N Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Advocate Triveni Potekar through Advocates Nivedita Sharma and Kirti Mewar. The petition mentioned about the countrys dire situation of being affected of this pandemic outbreak due to lack of infrastructure for screen testing, isolation facilities, trained health workers and medical facilities in the small and rural localities within the country. 

Further, it added that the public at large is in fear and uncertainty due to the spread of misinformation about the virus. Hence, it is the right of the public to be informed about the Centres and State Governments preparedness in restraining the spread of the pandemic virus.   

The petitioner opined that "...the Respondent No 1 (Centre) has not provided any preventive mechanism other than screening at 21 airport and ports and have established only 15 testing centres and 50 thousand PPEs and the same seems grossly inadequate."

Therefore, the petitioner has sought the judicial review of the preparation and steps taken by the Central and State Government based on scientific and not on an ad-hoc basis. Moreover, they sought directions for making information which is relevant along with guidance, availability of medical facilities for treatment and testing COVID-19/ Corona Virus to benefit the public in large. 

The matter will be next heard on March 30, 2020.

Similarly, Public Interest Litigation was filed by Advocate Shashank Shri Tripathi, who is a practising lawyer in the Allahabad High Court against the Respondent, Honourable High Court of Judicature at Allahabad and four others. 

The matter was heard by the bench consisting of Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court Govind Mathur and Justice Ramesh Sinha and they sought for writ like Mandamus to command the State of Uttar Pradesh and its subsidiaries to ensure suitable precautionary steps to restrict the infection of Novel Corona Virus in the premises of Allahabad High Court and Lucknow. 

The PIL sought directions to institute High-level Committee for precaution containing experts for prevention of COVID-19 in the premises of High Court. 

They also mentioned about the entrance of a large number of people visiting the premises of Allahabad High Court in which there may be people suffering from Corona Virus. Therefore, they stated that it was necessary to have precautionary measures and that it is required to identify the infected persons as well as to prevent the spread of the virus which will be a worldwide epidemic.

The Chief Medical Officer of Prayagraj has informed that they have already sent a team to the High Court of Allahabad to spray with Anti-Mosquito and fogging, the team has been formed to respond rapidly to the expansion of COVID-19. 

It was noted by the bench that, the measures taken by the Medical Officer of Prayagraj isnt quite effective to protect people from the virus but addressed about the advisories issued by the Government of Uttar Pradesh and steps to check the person infected with COVID-19. 

The High Court opined that these steps need to be complied with at the earliest. A complete report on the steps taken is also to be intimated to the High Court on the next date of hearing.

 

Author: Asif Iqbal 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email