38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Court holds Surgeon guilty of indulging in black magic during hearing; sentenced till rising of court [Read Order]

By Harshvardhan Sharma      18 August, 2025 12:40 PM      0 Comments
Court holds Surgeon guilty of indulging in black magic during hearing sentenced till rising of court

NEW DELHI: A Delhi Court has convicted a surgeon guilty of intentional insult to public servant and interruption of court proceedings by indulging in 'black magic' in the courtroom and sentenced him to imprisonment till rising of the court as he tendered apology and expressed remorse for his act.

Additional Sessions Judge Shefali Barnala Tandon found the act done by the accused as "very shocking and surprising"

The court said that the present accused Dr Chander Vibhas, who is stated to be a surgeon by profession and belonging to educated and elite class, has acted in such unreasonable manner and created interruption in court proceedings.

Accused Dr Chander Vibhas pleaded guilty and apologised for his said conduct.

"After considering all the facts and circumstances including apology tendered by the accused and his feeling of remorse, he is sentenced to undergo imprisonment till rising of the court and fine of Rs 2,000 to be deposited with State,'' the court said.

On August 11, 2025, the court was informed by the staff that the accused has thrown some rice under the dais, creating a scare among those present including the counsel who suspected it to be ''black magic''.

After enquiry, the accused stated that he was having some rice in his hands which have just fallen down. However, he failed to explain as to why he was carrying rice in his hands while entering the court and during the court proceedings.

The court was constrained to take cognisance of the offence under Section 267 BNS, 2023 against accused Dr Chander Vibhas since proceedings of the court were halted for about 15-20 minutes and the offence was triable by this very court where the said offence has been committed.

"The courtroom is a space where justice is sought and delivered and maintaining its dignity is essential for Rule of Law. Disrespect towards the court or disruption of judicial proceedings sends a damaging public message and such overt act/behaviour of accused today not only disrupted the court proceedings and undermined the judicial process but also threatens the very foundation of our legal system,'' the judge said.

The court noted Section 267 of BNS was to ensure that the courts can do their work without harassment or disturbance preserving both the order of proceedings and the authority of law.

"The act done by the accused if go unchecked will erode the court’s ability to function,'' it said.

The court also referred to the Maharashtra Prevention and Eradication of Human Sacrifice and other Inhuman, Evil and Aghori Practices and Black Magic Act, 2013, which prohibited and criminalised such practices.

During the proceedings, the court was also informed on August 02, 2025 when it was on leave, some rice were also found thrown on the floor. Though the accused claimed he was not physically present on that day, the order sheet, however, revealed otherwise.

The advocates present requested the court to get the rice removed as they hesitated to approach the dias for their matters to be taken up.

Accordingly, the court asked the accused to collect the rice from the floor which seemed to have been deliberately thrown by him. A sweeper was also called for cleaning purposes.

As the accused interrupted the court proceedings for 15-20 minutes, the court gave him notice of the offence under Section 267 BNS.

[Read Order]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

President Murmu Approves Historic Criminal Law Reforms President Murmu Approves Historic Criminal Law Reforms

President Droupadi Murmu has given assent to three significant criminal law reforms in India, marking a historic shift in the legislative landscape. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Act replace colonial-era laws, including the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, these reforms have sparked debate, with critics raising concerns over potential constitutional violations and the risk of police excesses under the new arrest and custody provisions.

Plea filed in Supreme Court to stay criminal laws Plea filed in Supreme Court to stay criminal laws

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking suspension of three new criminal laws, raising critical concerns over their impact on fundamental rights and the legal framework. The petition argues these laws, namely Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, potentially increase police powers and create confusion among citizens.

Legal Seminar on Mens Rights || New Criminal Laws || Watch LIVE Legal Seminar on Mens Rights || New Criminal Laws || Watch LIVE

Join Save Family Foundation & Men Welfare Trust's Legal Seminar on Men's Rights, free on LawStreet Journal's YouTube. Focus on false cases against men.

This judge of Madras HC will not refer to IPC by its new name This judge of Madras HC will not refer to IPC by its new name

A Madras HC judge said that he would continue to refer to IPC, CrPC and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, by their original names as he doesnt know Hindi.

TRENDING NEWS

pil-in-supreme-court-seeks-removal-of-up-ips-officer-ajay-pal-sharma-as-election-observer-in-west-bengal-polls
Trending Judiciary
PIL in Supreme Court Seeks Removal of UP IPS Officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Election Observer in West Bengal Polls

PIL in Supreme Court challenges appointment of UP IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as poll observer in West Bengal, alleging bias and violation of RP Act norms.

30 April, 2026 01:12 PM
bombay-hc-modifies-2046-order-in-defamation-suit-references-to-plaintiffs-age-and-20-year-adjournment-deleted-matter-listed-for-july
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Modifies “2046 Order” in Defamation Suit: References to Plaintiff’s Age and 20-Year Adjournment Deleted; Matter Listed for July [Read Order]

Bombay HC modifies ‘2046’ defamation order, deletes age and 20-year adjournment remarks, lists case for July 15, 2026 hearing.

30 April, 2026 01:18 PM

TOP STORIES

enough-is-enough-scwla-president-mahalakshmi-pavani-condemns-barbaric-attempt-to-murder-advocate-madhu-seeks-immediate-arrest-of-accused
Trending Legal Insiders
“Enough is Enough”: SCWLA President Mahalakshmi Pavani Condemns Barbaric Attempt to Murder Advocate Madhu, Seeks Immediate Arrest of Accused [Read Press Release]

SCWLA condemns brutal sword attack on Advocate Madhu Rajput; critical at AIIMS, accused absconding, immediate arrest demanded.

25 April, 2026 01:24 PM
sc-sets-3-week-deadline-for-nationwide-icu-standards-orders-states-to-submit-action-plans
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets 3-Week Deadline for Nationwide ICU Standards; Orders States to Submit Action Plans [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs States to finalise ICU standards within 3 weeks, impleads Nursing and Paramedical Councils in nationwide framework push.

25 April, 2026 04:30 PM
continuous-mobile-location-sharing-cannot-be-imposed-as-a-bail-condition-karnataka-hc
Trending Judiciary
Continuous Mobile Location-Sharing Cannot Be Imposed As A Bail Condition: Karnataka HC [Read Order]

Karnataka High Court quashes bail condition mandating continuous mobile location-sharing, holding it amounts to impermissible electronic surveillance.

25 April, 2026 04:40 PM
police-cannot-arrest-accused-in-private-complaint-cases-absent-non-bailable-warrant-high-courts-should-not-entertain-anticipatory-bail-in-such-matters-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police Cannot Arrest Accused in Private Complaint Cases Absent Non-Bailable Warrant; High Courts Should Not Entertain Anticipatory Bail in Such Matters: SC

Supreme Court rules police cannot arrest in private complaints without NBW; says High Courts should not entertain anticipatory bail in such cases.

25 April, 2026 05:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email