38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 19, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Court rejects bail by Delhi Minister Jain in PMLA case [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      18 November, 2022 06:20 PM      0 Comments
Court rejects bail by Delhi Minister Jain in PMLA case

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Thursday said Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar Kumar Jain has prima facie indulged in the offence of money laundering of more than Rs one crore as it dismissed his bail in a case filed by the Enforcement Directorate.

The court also said it has prima facie come on record that he was actually involved in concealing the proceeds of crime by giving cash to the Kolkata based entry operators and thereafter, bringing the cash into three companies.

Special Judge Vikas Dhull said Jain is not entitled to the benefit of bail having regard to the twin conditions provided in Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

Section 45 of the PMLA laid down 'twin conditions' for the grant of bail to an accused, to be ascertained by the court reasonable grounds for believing that she/he is not guilty of such offence; and she/he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

Jain, arrested in the PMLA case on May 30, is presently lodged in Tihar jail.

In its order, the court said, "The offence of money laundering is a serious economic offence and the view of the Supreme Court with regard to economic offences is that they constitute a class apart and need to be visited with a different approach in the matter of bail."

It also relied upon the Supreme Court's judgement which stated that the economic offences have deep rooted conspiracies and involve huge loss of public funds need to be viewed seriously and considered as grave offences affecting the economy of the country as a whole and thereby posing serious threat to the financial health of the country.

The court also pointed out it has prima facie come on record that Jain was actually involved in concealing the proceeds of crime by giving cash to the Kolkata based entry operators and thereafter, bringing the cash into three companies namely, M/s Manglayatan Developers/Projects Pvt Ltd, M/s Akinchan Developers Pvt Ltd and M/s Paryas Infosolutions Pvt Ltd against the sale of shares to show that income of these three companies was untainted one.

"By this process, the proceeds of crime to the tune of 1/3rd of Rs 4.61 Crore has been laundered. Apart from that, Jain has also used the same modus operandi to convert his proceeds of crime of Rs 15,00,000 by receiving accommodation entries from Kolkata based entry operators in his company by the name of M/s J J Ideal Estate Pvt Ltd," it said.

"Jain had knowingly done such activity to obliterate the tracing of the source of ill-gotten money and accordingly, the proceeds of crime was layered through Kolkata based entry operators in a way that its source was difficult to decipher," it further said.

The court said the amount lying in the accounts of the three companies was in fact the amount belonging to Jain and two other co-accused persons namely, Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain.

"The cash which was provided by Jain and other two co-accused persons was to the tune of Rs 4.61 Crore during the check period. The amount of Rs 4.61 Crore is not notional or assumptive but has been established on record by the statement of Jagdish Prasad Mohta and Rajender Bansal, who was the Kolkata based entry operator. The process adopted by Jain and other two co-accused persons namely Vaibhav and Ankush whereby proceeds of crime and unaccounted cash was converted into the income of the companies and shares of co-accused Ankush Jain and Vaibhav Jain was the process or the activity done with an intention of concealment of proceeds of crime and to show that the shares bought back by co-accused Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain or that the money received in three companies, was untainted. Therefore, prima facie this activity falls within the four corners of offence of money laundering as defined in Section 3 of PMLA," the court said.

Read Order



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

i-respect-all-religions-cji-on-social-media-reactions-to-remarks-on-reconstruction-of-lord-vishnu-idol
Trending Legal Insiders
'I respect all religions,' CJI on social media reactions to remarks on reconstruction of Lord Vishnu idol

CJI B R Gavai clarifies remarks on Lord Vishnu idol plea, says his words were misrepresented on social media and he respects all religions.

18 September, 2025 04:25 PM
sc-orders-cbi-probe-into-advocates-degree-after-university-denies-authenticity
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders CBI Probe Into Advocate’s Degree After University Denies Authenticity [Read Order]

Supreme Court orders CBI probe into advocate Naresh Dilawari’s BCom degree after Magadh University declares the certificate forged.

18 September, 2025 04:58 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-asks-why-anti-pollution-measures-firecrackers-ban-for-delhi-alone
Trending Judiciary
SC asks why anti pollution measures, firecrackers ban for Delhi alone

SC questions why firecracker bans, anti-pollution steps apply only to Delhi; stresses need for uniform clean air policy across India.

13 September, 2025 10:43 AM
delhi-hc-restrains-unauthorised-use-of-abhishek-bachchans-personality-rights
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Restrains Unauthorised Use Of Abhishek Bachchan’s Personality Rights [Read Order]

Delhi HC restrains misuse of Abhishek Bachchan’s personality rights, orders removal of unauthorized content, citing dignity & economic harm.

13 September, 2025 12:42 PM
delhi-hc-upholds-cbfc-ban-on-film-masoom-kaatil-for-promoting-vigilantism-communal-disharmony
Trending CelebStreet
Delhi HC Upholds CBFC Ban on Film ‘Masoom Kaatil’ for Promoting Vigilantism, Communal Disharmony [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds CBFC’s refusal to certify ‘Masoom Kaatil’, citing vigilantism, communal disharmony, gore and risk to social harmony.

13 September, 2025 01:02 PM
grandchild-cannot-claim-share-in-grandparents-property-if-parents-are-alive-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Grandchild Cannot Claim Share In Grandparents Property If Parents Are Alive: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Grandchildren have no automatic right to grandparents’ property if parents are alive: Delhi HC clears misconception

15 September, 2025 10:34 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email