![Court rejects Muslim side's plea against maintainability of suit on Gyanvapi mosque [Read Order]](/secure/uploads/2022/09/lj_2221_WhatsApp_Image_2022-09-12_at_8.38.43_PM.jpeg)
NEW DELHI: The Varanasi district court on Monday rejected a contention by the Muslim side, questioning the maintainability of a petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities and idols, located on an outer wall of the Gyanvapi mosque.
The court also said the suit filed by the women was not barred by the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, related to maintaining status of religious places as prevailed on August 15, 1947.
"The plaintiffs are claiming only right to worship at the disputed property. They want to worship Maa Sringar Gauri and other visible and invisible deities with the contention that they worshipped there till the year 1993 and the plaintiffs are not claiming ownership over the disputed property. They have also not filed the suit for declaration that the disputed property is a temple," District Judge A K Vishvesh said.
The court ordered that it would continue to hear the petition seeking the right to worship in the temple. The court fixed September 22 as the next date of hearing in the case for filing written statement and framing of issues.
A group of five women led by Rakhi Singh filed the petition seeking permission for daily worship of Hindu deities.
The Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee has said the Gyanvapi mosque is a Waqf property and has questioned the maintainability of the plea.
In its detailed order, the court noted according to the pleadings of the plaintiffs, they were worshipping Maa Sringar Gauri, Lord Hanuman, Lord Ganesh at the disputed place incessantly since a long time till 1993.
"After 1993, they were allowed to worship the Gods only once in a year under the regulatory of State of Uttar Pradesh. Thus, according to plaintiffs, they worshipped Maa Sringar Gauri, Lord Hanuman at the disputed place regularly even after 15th August, 1947. Therefore, The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 does not operate as bar on the suit of the plaintiffs and the suit of plaintiffs is not barred by Section 9 of the Act," the court said.
With regard to another whether the suit of the plaintiffs is barred by Section 85 of The Waqf Act 1995, the court concluded "the provision does not operate in the present case because the plaintiffs are non-Muslims and strangers to the alleged Waqf created at the disputed property".
The court, which also framed a question whether the suit of the plaintiffs is barred by the Uttar Pradesh Sri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Act, 1983, held no bar has been imposed by this law with regard to a suit claiming right to worship idols installed in the endowment within the premises of the temple, or outside.
On May 20, this year, the Supreme Court has transferred the proceedings of the suit by Hindu parties seeking worshipping rights at the Gynavapi mosque to the district judge in Varanasi.
However, the court had then said its May 17 interim order directing protection of the 'Shivling', and free access to Muslims to the site for offering namaz should remain operational for eight weeks, after district judge's decision in the matter.
The Muslim side had challenged the Allahabad High Court's order, which had upheld the decision to appoint the court commissioner to survey the premises.
A 'Shivling' was purportedly found during the survey by the court commissioner within the mosque complex, where the Muslims used to do 'vaju' (ablution) before namaz.
