38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, August 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

'Court won't normally stay law,' SC on plea to restrain Govt on appointment of ECs as per new law

By Jhanak Sharma      15 March, 2024 03:49 PM      0 Comments
'Court won't normally stay law,' SC on plea to restrain Govt on appointment of ECs as per new law

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said the court normally won't stay a legislation by interim order as it agreed to examine on March 21 a matter related to appointment of two Election Commissioners per the law passed by Parliament in December, 2023.

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta and Augustine George Masih said it would consider the applications for staying the implementation of Section 7 of the Chief Election Commission and other Election Commissions (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, which dropped the CJI from the panel on appointment of the constitutional body.

Also Read -  SC refuses to stay new law on appointment of CEC and ECs 

"Let the interlocutory applications come up for hearing," the bench told senior advocates Kapil Sibal, and Vikas Singh and advocate Prashant Bhushan appearing for applicants.

The bench also pointed out the matter has come before the court twice earlier and it was pointed out that the court normally won't stay a legislation by interim order.

Senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for a petitioner, contended that the government has preponed the meeting of the panel to select two Election Commissioners.

He asked the court to see the Supreme Court's previous Constitution bench decision on March 2, 2023 which stated the appointment to the post of Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners have to be made by a panel also comprising the CJI.

Also Read -  Supreme Court refuses stay law on appointment of CEC and ECs

The bench, however, asked the counsel to come to the final direction in the judgment.

The Constitution bench had then stated that the panel suggested by the court was to be formed until a law is passed by Parliament.

The counsel, however, said when a judgment has been passed by this court, there can't be transgression. The final direction of the court was that the appointment would be made by the panel of the Prime Minister, CJI and Leader of Opposition, he said.

The bench fixed the matter for hearing on March 21.

On March 14, 2024 retired IAS officers Gyanesh Kumar and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu were appointed as Election Commissioners by a panel of Prime Minister, Union Law Minister and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha. Both the ECs took charge and assumed the office on Friday.

NGO Association for Democratic Reforms and Congress leader Jaya Thakur have filed separate applications for a direction to stay the law.

One Election Commissioner Arun Goel resigned on March 9, and another one Election Commissioner A C Pandey completed the term in February.

 



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email