38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, September 01, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Judiciary

Criminal cases can't be equated with matrimonial proceedings: Bombay High Court Rejects Transfer Plea

By Deeksha Sinha      10 March, 2022 05:05 PM      0 Comments
Criminal cases can't be equated with matrimonial proceedings: Bombay High Court Rejects Transfer Plea

The said order came on an application seeking transfer of proceedings filed by a wife of an accused in a matrimonial cruelty case. 

Shital Aditya Jibhkate V. State of Maharashtra & Ors

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court recently rejected an application filed for transfer of trial proceedings from Nagpur to Akola for offenses under 498 A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 

Although the law prioritizes the convenience of the wife while dealing with the matrimonial disputes, Justice AK Kilor was of the view that the criminal case cannot be equated with matrimonial proceedings. 

 

In a criminal case, the consequences of non-appearance of the accused would be quite drastic and thus, the said consequences cannot be ignored while considering the request of transfer of criminal trial to Akola, for her convenience," the single judge stated.

Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code deals with punishments for the offense of a husband and/or his kin subjecting the wife to cruelty.

The applicant moved the application citing financial, medical and jurisdictional difficulties. She submitted that since she is unemployed, she does not earn any income. Adding health issues to the application. 

She claimed that she was advised bed-rest by a doctor on account of having suffered a miscarriage in March last year. Her plea also stated that since three connected matrimonial matters were pending at the Akola court, the criminal proceeding ought to be transferred for the sake of her convenience.

Further, she alleged that her life was under threat and placed reliance on the judgment of Gujarat High Court in Dharmendrabhai Patadia vs State of Gujarat & Ors.

Her plea was strongly opposed by the accused-respondents as they were of the view that her role in the criminal proceedings was minimal, and did not demand her attendance on every date of hearing. They highlighted that, in contrast, non-attendance on their part would yield drastic results in the form of issuance of bailable or non-bailable warrants.

The Court's attention was brought to the fact that all the 22 witnesses were residents of Nagpur. Their convenience is relevant, it was submitted.

Relying on the Supreme Court's judgment in Jyoti Mishra vs Dhananjaya Mishra, the respondents asserted that a criminal case and matrimonial proceedings cannot be equated. Hence, they requested the Court to not consider the application for transfer of proceedings.

The High Court rejected the application, holding that the convenience of the 22 witnesses was relevant.

The applicant was represented by Advocate SP Sontakke. Advocate AN Jaiswal appeared for the respondents. Additional Public Prosecutor SD Sirpurkar represented the State of Maharashtra.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-sets-up-sit-on-allegations-against-anant-ambani-vantara
Trending CelebStreet
SC sets up SIT on allegations against Anant Ambani's Vantara [Read Order]

SC forms SIT led by ex-judge J Chelameswar to probe allegations of illegal animal acquisition, mistreatment & financial irregularities at Anant Ambani’s Vantara.

26 August, 2025 01:57 PM
sc-deplores-high-courts-for-delaying-judgments-over-a-year
Trending Judiciary
SC Deplores High Courts for Delaying Judgments Over a Year [Read Judgment]

SC slams delay: Supreme Court deplores HCs for not delivering judgments for over a year after reserving cases, eroding faith in justice.

26 August, 2025 05:17 PM
cant-projects-judges-as-political-actors-ex-cjis-former-judges-rebut-statement
Trending Executive
'Can't projects judges as political actors,' ex CJIs, former judges rebut statement by ex judges on statement of Amit Shah [Read Statement]

56 former judges, including ex-CJIs Sathasivam & Gogoi, rebut peers’ statement on Amit Shah, stressing judiciary must stay above politics.

27 August, 2025 06:46 PM
supreme-court-appoints-two-new-judges-justice-alok-aradhe-and-future-cji-vipul-pancholi
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court Appoints Two New Judges: Justice Alok Aradhe & Future CJI Vipul Pancholi

SC gets two new judges — Justices Alok Aradhe and Vipul Manubhai Pancholi, with Pancholi set to be CJI in 2031. Oath administered by CJI Gavai.

29 August, 2025 02:23 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email